Jump to content

A Laboratory Director's Question?


Dansket

Recommended Posts

This is a question posed by my Laboratory director:

 

Given this scenario, "Patient with a history of anti-Jka whose current antibody screen is negative.  Two units of RBCs are ordered for transfusion tomorrow evening." 

 

1. Does your blood bank crossmatch random donor units and issue crossmatch-compatible donor units?

 

    or

 

2. Crossmatch Jka- donor units  and issue crossmatch-compatible Jka- donor units?

 

    or

 

3.  Do you think this is a trick question?

 

I'd appreciate as many responses as possible.

 

Thanks,

 

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for you. What is your lab director's blood bank back ground? I had a lab director once and his only qualifications for the job was a BS in business (long story). He would ask these kinds of questions.  :cries:

He is a CLS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number 1 is WRONG as following this procedure will lead to possible anamnestic response*. 

 

Number 2 is the RIGHT PROCEDURE to follow to prevent possible anamnestic response*. 

 

Number 3: This is definitely NOT A TRICKY QUESTION. 

 

Anamnestic Response: An accentuated antibody response following a secondary exposure to an antigen. Antibody levels from the initial exposure may not be be detectable in the patient's plama until the secondary exposure, when a rapid rinse in antibody titre may occur. This may lead to haemolytic transfusion reaction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As bloodbanks become increasingly digitized, less and less qualified people become associated with them. We withdraw in horror at the prospect of choice number one  being even a choice on the table.

However, we must get accept the fact that as experienced blood bank staff retires and replacements are chosen in "cost-efficient" manners, as one would chose a nut or a bolt, the consequences of

inappropriate choices will become more frequent. Smaller hospitals and rural hospitals which cannot

compete for the needed staff will evince the most errors. I can't speculate on the number of errors, but

my feeling is that percentages are now rising.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As bloodbanks become increasingly digitized, less and less qualified people become associated with them. We withdraw in horror at the prospect of choice number one  being even a choice on the table.

However, we must get accept the fact that as experienced blood bank staff retires and replacements are chosen in "cost-efficient" manners, as one would chose a nut or a bolt, the consequences of

inappropriate choices will become more frequent. Smaller hospitals and rural hospitals which cannot

compete for the needed staff will evince the most errors. I can't speculate on the number of errors, but

my feeling is that percentages are now rising.

I agree with Pavel and thank goodness most of us have computer systems that would not allow #1. 

Edited by R1R2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.