Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
comment_65065

I run the Provue with the polyspecific DAT card. We only run an IgG control on this. I think I want to transition to the card that does IgG and Complement separately. What control cells do everyone use for the anti-complement gel testing? Brands and such, I mean, I know how to run them.

  • Replies 17
  • Views 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Malcolm Needs
    Malcolm Needs

    We, in the UK (and I think in Europe) have the cards shown below (and similar cards are available from other suppliers, such as Ortho, and they are FANTASTIC!

  • Apparently they don't. I recall seeing a picture of them, but maybe they never got off the ground or were discontinued.

  • David Saikin
    David Saikin

    I have used these cards (research only) and they are excellent!  Actually found a patient with a  +IgM DAT (they had a strong anti-I and I expected to get complement reactions but only the IgM reacted

Posted Images

comment_65066

We are using Immucor's cells.  They are decent in tube, so I would assume they would be slightly better in Gel...this is blood banking though and assumptions are not always correct!

comment_65109

I have used the Immucor product but now use the one from Quotient.  I do my anti-C3 testing in buffered gel.  My complement control cells are always 4+.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Author
comment_65312
On 3/28/2016 at 9:49 AM, goodchild said:

I'll be honest, I didn't even know Ortho produced monospecific cards.

Apparently they don't. I recall seeing a picture of them, but maybe they never got off the ground or were discontinued.

comment_65313

I hope someone comes up with them soon. I would be much happier with gel DATs to get rid of a little subjectivity.

comment_65318
1 hour ago, goodchild said:

I hope someone comes up with them soon. I would be much happier with gel DATs to get rid of a little subjectivity.

You can do anti-complement testing in buffered gel.  I use it for all my DATs (Ortho gel) and I've tested in with the Grifols' product and it works with that gel also.

comment_65320

We, in the UK (and I think in Europe) have the cards shown below (and similar cards are available from other suppliers, such as Ortho, and they are FANTASTIC!

007.JPG

comment_65323

I have used these cards (research only) and they are excellent!  Actually found a patient with a  +IgM DAT (they had a strong anti-I and I expected to get complement reactions but only the IgM reacted).   too bad they are not available in the USA.  I haven't seen them on anyone's list of available or pending cards.

  • 5 months later...
comment_67149
On 4/11/2016 at 9:28 AM, David Saikin said:

You can do anti-complement testing in buffered gel.  I use it for all my DATs (Ortho gel) and I've tested in with the Grifols' product and it works with that gel also.

Would you mind sharing your procedure?  I don't suppose you have found a way to automate it on one of Ortho's machines, have you?  I keep thinking we could jury-rig about any test if we call it a crossmatch. ;)

comment_67173

Mabel, I don't have access to those procedures any more.  I used 50 uL of 0.8% cells, 25uL of anti-C3b,-C3d.  Buffered gel.  Let sit 5 minutes at room temp.  MTS centrifuge for 10 minutes.  I used Ortho's anti- Compl and Quotient's Comp control cells.  I ran the pt,, Pos and neg controls.  Origianlly I ran a pt neg control also but stopped that.  My neg control was my A2 cell (0.8%).

I ran everything all the time as I did not have many DAT orders.  You probably could opt for running QC once/24 hrs.

comment_67191

David, did you start with 3% A2 cells and dilute them to 0.8%? Did you dilute the A2, patient and complement coated cells with MTS diluent 2 or with 2 Plus?  Were the results comparable to tube or more sensitive?

comment_67197
Quote

I use Ortho's 0.8% A2 cells.  gotta use them for something.  Hemobioscience's Gel Cell Diluent.  Dilute the CCt cells.  More sensitive.  The QC cells are always 3-4+

 

  • 2 weeks later...
comment_67259
On ‎9‎/‎18‎/‎2016 at 6:46 PM, Mabel Adams said:

Would you mind sharing your procedure?  I don't suppose you have found a way to automate it on one of Ortho's machines, have you?  I keep thinking we could jury-rig about any test if we call it a crossmatch. ;)

The other approach is to label reagent vials with a provue-readable bar code for either AG-IAT or AG-IS.  Labeled vials are then placed in the reagent carousel.  I user Avery 5267 address labels.

avery vial labels.jpg

vials barcode view.jpg

vials front view.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
comment_67404
On ‎10‎/‎19‎/‎2016 at 3:46 PM, Mabel Adams said:
On ‎10‎/‎19‎/‎2016 at 3:46 PM, Mabel Adams said:

Is this codabar or 3of 9 or does it matter?

Is this codabar or 3of 9 or does it matter?

It's Code 128.  The barcode has to be small to fit on label. 

comment_67413
On 9/22/2016 at 9:29 AM, Mabel Adams said:

David, did you start with 3% A2 cells and dilute them to 0.8%? Did you dilute the A2, patient and complement coated cells with MTS diluent 2 or with 2 Plus?  Were the results comparable to tube or more sensitive?

Mabel,  we just started using the buffered gel cards for our DATs.  We use 3% A2, complement control cells, and patient sample and dilute to 0.8% with MTS Diluent 2.  We also run controls each time, since that's really the only way to make sure you have added the anti-C3b,-C3d!  We do IgG in the IgG gel cards and got rid of polyspecific AHG.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.