Jump to content

Darren

Members
  • Content Count

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3
  • Country

    United States

Darren last won the day on November 20 2018

Darren had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Occupation
    Clinical Laboratory Scientist

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I "review" everything. I put it in quotes because it's actually done automatically thanks to my girlfriend being a SQL report writer in IT. If you have a SQL writer you can have them whip up a report that does the reviews for you and you just stamp it reviewed and take whatever corrective actions you need. I guess this also assumes that your facility is using a TAR system for nursing to enter vitals and whatnot. It's really baffling why we don't see LIS systems taking more into account the regulating agencies and tailoring their software to it. So many things that are manually looked at could be done in the background.
  2. Why interpret it at all until the extended testing is done? It seems this would create confusion among doctors. "It was negative and then it wasn't!"
  3. Officially we say "females less than 50", cheeky man.
  4. Is that 16% all Rh neg women or just ones with FMH? If it's just FMH patients then the overall number of people developing anti-D would be very low. To conserve Rh negative we often give Rh pos instead to anyone except women in child bearing years and I can think of 1 in the past two or three years that actually made an anti-D. I've seen more anti-E and -K develop than anti-D. Allergies, man. Some people get them on the first dose and some never do after twenty.
  5. Thanks, jazzman. Does anyone here that uses an IR thermometer do daily QC on it? If so, how? Measure room temp and a cold unit?
  6. Are units that are not in a cooler and are taken from a blood bank to patient's room considered storage as well?
  7. It was a bit of a troll question. It seemed to me that if we can't trust the reactions we get in gel then what's the point of using it. As far as I can tell regarding the IFU's Dansket is right. I realize the importance of precision and care being taken in the blood bank, but I think a lot of times we fall victim to an overabundance of undue caution.
  8. Do people call antibody screens negative if they are 1+ or 2+?
  9. If it's positive in gel, we consider them positive. It's been that way at this facility since we went to gel in 2004. We haven't see any complications because of it, but then with our volumes we probably wouldn't. Probably the majority of our daily testing is prenatal type and screen testing from our doctors office. We don't have a huge daily volume though. A dozen separate patients would be about as busy as we'd get. I would say most of our patients are pretty healthy with strong antigen expression. I don't see many below 2+ on them. We only weak D test cord bloods. Isn't it the general statistic that 16% of Rh neg mothers will develop anti-D without RhIgG? You can probably run the numbers on how many you have that test at 1+ and 2+ and then check their results against any DNA testing you've done. You might find that the low the percentage may not be worth the extra fuss. I believe I heard the number of people having just one child is increasing. Huge world of statistics to consider!
  10. Can you give a description of your validation process? I'd like to do away with the #%$^& Ohaus hanging scale we use. I just got some macopharma bags in to get up and running. Thanks.
  11. Does anyone here use poc phlebotomy? We're looking into it and evaluating it now. I've heard of hospitals adding T&S/Xm testing to existing CBC specimens when they use the bedside labeling with patient wristband barcode scanning. In these cases I think they just run a second type on the same specimen if they do EXM. We have EXM validated (for years now), but are not using it yet due to having a timid pathologist. Currently we have a two person verification system when blood bank specimens are collected and banded and we run a second type on that same specimen. Probably not ideal if we go to EXM (eventually . . . hopefully . . . dear god please!). I've heard of other hospitals running a second type on an existing CBC specimen collected at a different time, even from up to a week old. Thoughts?
  12. Replacing with the cal expires seems extremely wasteful. Although it's probably good for whoever's turn it is to get a new thermometer for their home chest freezer or what not. We have a company that comes in every six months and checks out all of our pipettes and thermometers and maintains various things like microscopes. It's quite nice.
  13. Anyone using Radiometer's Aqure Xpress? If so, how much does it cost? i assume it's a yearly fee. If anyone uses the full version I'd like to know if handles glucometers as well. And how much it is.
  14. We use the FetalScreen II from Ortho/Quotient. Reading through the instructions for use makes me wonder if it's useful at all. I think we may consider some send out options for KHB or flow cytometry and relieve the bench staff of the effort altogether.
  15. I order all tests for all blood bank CAP specimens in our LIS and label them for the techs doing the testing. I've always been told that QC and CAPs are supposed to be ran exactly the same as patients. With that in mind I order everything for the tech and present it to them as if it were any other patient. It really cuts down on flubs and clerical problems and you get so much less complaints about having to do a survey specimen.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.