Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
comment_83201

A question for those of you who have interfaced instruments:  are you using autoverification.

  • Replies 13
  • Views 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • We use an IH-500.  If the reactions in the software have no discrepancies (from previous or within the current results, weak reactions, error codes, etc.) they will autovalidate to our LIS.  Our

comment_83250

We use an IH-500.  If the reactions in the software have no discrepancies (from previous or within the current results, weak reactions, error codes, etc.) they will autovalidate to our LIS. 

Our LIS does not autoverify.  Those are always looked at before being released.

sandra

comment_83276
On 4/14/2022 at 7:14 AM, AuntiS said:

We use an IH-500.  If the reactions in the software have no discrepancies (from previous or within the current results, weak reactions, error codes, etc.) they will autovalidate to our LIS. 

Our LIS does not autoverify.  Those are always looked at before being released.

sandra

We use the Immucor Echo and have it set up the same way.  No reason to look at it twice, but I definitely would not set it to autoverify.

comment_83298

No here as well. Curious though, is there a standard or regulation that forbids autoverification in Blood Bank? I have always heard that it is not allowed in blood bank but why? Can someone point me to the standard? This question has come up where I work several times and I have always just said it is not allowed but can't say why.

comment_83305
7 hours ago, jayinsat said:

No here as well. Curious though, is there a standard or regulation that forbids autoverification in Blood Bank? I have always heard that it is not allowed in blood bank but why? Can someone point me to the standard? This question has come up where I work several times and I have always just said it is not allowed but can't say why.

My impression (and experience) is that when instruments are initially set-up the system is not really trusted and everyone is more comfortable with manual verification. Over time change becomes harder, drops in priority and so manual verification becomes dogma. 

  • 1 year later...
comment_87483

We will be going live with Safetrace in September, which can be set up to Autoverify.  As I understand it only interpretations that match the Vision logic will be sent, and then the Safetrace truth tables come in to play.  We would only be sending over negative screens, negative DATs and ABORhs that had a valid interpretation on the Vision.

We don't have our interface yet but plan on doing extensive testing before pulling the trigger on autoverify.  Hoping to implement it!

applejw - any issues encountered with Autoverify?

On 4/26/2022 at 8:56 AM, applejw said:

We have Ortho Visions and do autoverify.

 

comment_87499

No issues that can't be attributed to temporary cognitive disunion.  The instruments do what they are supposed to do and it makes it much smoother for the interfaced result review in Soft. We don't have it set up as Chemistry and Hematology do - we do have to review and complete the result even if normal and/or negative.  But one less step for us helps a lot.

comment_87504
9 hours ago, applejw said:

No issues that can't be attributed to temporary cognitive disunion.  The instruments do what they are supposed to do and it makes it much smoother for the interfaced result review in Soft. We don't have it set up as Chemistry and Hematology do - we do have to review and complete the result even if normal and/or negative.  But one less step for us helps a lot.

Yes, Agree. Doing so we validate the interpretation of result.

  • 10 months later...
comment_91121

Yes we do

As our blood bank system verify results from the previous history and move to supervisor verification  incase of discrepancy. ALL routine cases are auto verify.

For first time cases two groups are mandatory before allowing  for compatibility  testing .

This is all done by Panacea blood banking management  information  system 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.