Jump to content

Dansket

Members - Bounced Email
  • Posts

    631
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by Dansket

  1.  

    9 minutes ago, Likewine99 said:

    Two cell screen for as long as I can remember.  It saved the organization quite a bit of money and we keep 2 panels in stock.

    Have been on gel since 1994 and automated BB analyzer for almost 13 years.

    Did you attend ORTHO's very first ProVue training session?  

  2. The was a white paper written by John Judd many years ago regarding 2 versus 3 cell screens.  In this study, he observed that technique (tube testing) was a far greater variable affecting test tube reaction strength than the number of cells in the antibody screen.  Since 3 cell screens are configured with more double-dose cells than 2-cell screens, it might mitigate the weaker reactions found by some individuals.

  3. On ‎3‎/‎23‎/‎2017 at 8:27 AM, BldBnker said:

    According to AABB Standard 5.30.2 part 2; "the woman is not known to be actively immunized to the D antigen."  We perform an antibody screen, along with an  ABO/Rh on a current sample before issuing a Rhogam. This is for ED patients and LD patients.

    I'm not understanding how performing an antibody screen determines whether or not "the woman is not known to be actively immunized to the D antigen" meets the AABB requirement.  If I understand correctly you perform and antibody screen and do antibody identification, and if anti-D is identified (in the absence of a record of recent RhIG injection) you ignore that finding and give RhoGAM.  

    In our process, we do an Rh type only and if patient is Rh negative and in the absence of a record of recent RhIG injection, we issue RhoGAM.  So for this hypothetical patient, we both come the same conclusion and issue RhoGAM.

  4. 39 minutes ago, BldBnker said:

    Dansket, I am not sure I understand your question.  That is the standard AABB protocol.  You perform an antibody screen to determine if the woman has already been immunized to the D antigen (ab screen neg for Anti-D).  

    If a positive antibody screen is detected per your protocol and anti-D is identified in the "pre-partum" blood sample, how do you determine if the anti-D identified represents "active immunization to the D antigen" or "passive immunization due to a recent RhIg injection" in the absence of any record of recent RhIg injection.

    I'm not aware of any serological test that all experts agree will definitively differentiate between active and passive immunization in all situations.  If there is such a publication I would like the reference.  Malcolm please advise.

  5. 27 minutes ago, BldBnker said:

    According to AABB Standard 5.30.2 part 2; "the woman is not known to be actively immunized to the D antigen."  We perform an antibody screen, along with an  ABO/Rh on a current sample before issuing a Rhogam. This is for ED patients and LD patients.

    AABB Standards only apply to AABB accredited facilities.  Is there a standardized protocol provided by the AABB to determine whether or not a woman is actively immunized to the D antigen then anti-D is identified in her blood sample?

  6. Our cord blood samples are collected in red tops. They arrive in BBK usually with one giant clot.  We remove the clot, centrifuge and test on ProVue.  We stopped using EDTA samples because they usually had numerous small clots that were very time consuming to remove.

  7. 32 minutes ago, R1R2 said:

    Not to hijack the topic but does your label print after you issue in the computer or before?

    The Report of Blood Transfusion form (with detachable labels) is printed immediately after crossmatch results entry.  Blood components (Report of Blood Transfusion form is attached prior to storage) are retrieved from storage when RN arrives with Request for Blood Component form.

    1. What automation platform do you use? ProVue
    2. What LIS? Meditech C/S version 5.67

    3. Do you use middleware? No, ProVue is not interfaced to Meditech

    4. Do you use positive patient identification? Yes, Typenex Blood Recipient Identification System

    5. To get a second blood group, by retesting the sample (i.e. PPI) do you:

    • Generate a new specimen number and re-label or aliquot? No, a new specimen number is generated and a new blood sample is collected if original blood sample was agglutinated by anti-A,B (manual tube test).
    • Generate new tests for the same specimen number. If so, will the analyzer retest that same sample with the new tests and generate a second ABO/Rh? No

    1. Do you use history from another site (like Clinical Connect here in Southern Ontario or other Electronic Health Record) as a historical result? No

      • If so, have you created a new test that your LIS will use as a second group to use for Computer XM? Yes, depending on results of testing with anti-A,B, CONFIRM or CONFIRMO.

    2. Do all your samples expire after 96 hours?  Or do you have a pre-op policy that allows for more time as long as the patient has not been transfused/pregnant.  We have a 28 day policy. All samples expire at 2359 on the third calendar day (day sample collected counted as day zero)

    3. Any other brilliant ideas or thoughts? By retesting the same blood sample, you won't detect specimen collection errors.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.