Jump to content

Eagle Eye

Members
  • Posts

    1,508
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by Eagle Eye

  1. Our pathologist gets called for every reation after the work up compelted for transfusion reaction other than hives. 

    Based on temp. rise pathologist orders culture on bag and/or patient. Our microbiology department is closed at nigth so we keep the bag in ref. 

    if the pathologist want to order culture on patient, that need to be doen ASAP. 

  2. Congrats..Mine was 11 yes ago but most of the questions you indicated...i had similar...had few more for HLA and paternity questions, CCI , PRA and standard question(particularly component QC).

     

  3. we have very active level I trauma center...

    all our trauma docs knows very well that we need a sample and invariably the sample get drawn for all out trauma protocols.

    Sometime few minutes late to blood bank but we issue type specific almost >95% of the time.

    Only few cases where the patients BP was so low that they could not draw specimen and we had to use O RBC and AB plasma that was several years ago....

  4. Were you able to show them associated cost of running lab (including QCs, PT, competency, staffing) Vs ER puts their act together and give you good specimen (basically fix pre-anlaytics before switching analytic).

    We went through this and with 1) the cost we provided to run the lab and 2) improvement in TAT for Ed specimens ....we avoided going to your route...

    Actually reporting mis-match historical blood type due to WBIT was big help..

  5. On 3/31/2017 at 11:19 AM, David Saikin said:

    I recently dealt with an upgrade to Epic/Beaker:  I found the validation to be sketchy when it came to integration with the blood bank system (HCLL).  A bigger problem was the time it took BBIS results to populate in EPIC.  I also found that there were inconsistencies in training and actually program development for the Nursing on line transfusion: ordering and infusion, esp w the operating suite.  If I had not left I was tempted to report to the FDA.  Was unable to have access to the intersystem validations.  I was told they were done but from the way the systems interacted I wanted to see the actual data . . .  not forthcoming.  I know folks who love EPIC/Beaker - my situation may have been an anomaly . . . 

    I agree with you David. When it comes to validation data involving EPIC...there is always this answer which i do not agree and i can see as a blood banker we do not agree with it was done...:show us the document , if you it is not documented it is not done, right!".......BUT some fights are not worth... Let the STATE or FDA or... cite them and then it will change...

  6. I agree with Dansket. Change your process.

    We used to have lots of spike son our charts and documentation inventory?

    We have electronic system now and everytime the temp. goes to 5C, we get a call and tech is required to check all temperatures and add comment in computer.....guess what the ref. does not alarm at all...the tech changed the process ...they closed the door early enough to the temperature does not even go to 5C!

     

  7. when I interfaced ProVue to cerner classic...it was a pain and took long time. make sure the names matches as it is require din Vision, DI and cerner Milennium.

    middleware requirement is based on LIS system. Cerner needs DI. I thought soft doesn't need DI to connect to ProVue it may be different with Vision.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.