Jump to content

Janet C.

Recommended Posts

We recently got a new freezer for the Blood Bank. I am performing my first validation. I am comparing the NIST against the digital display as well as the chart and our own, seperate thermometer. I cannot find any documentation to support how much difference is acceptable between the NIST and the digital read/our thermometer/ etc. Some places I have read say 0.5 degrees which seems very tight to me. Another facility I work for uses 1.0 degree difference which seems more acceptable and able to obtain but I have not found any supporting documentation anywhere!

Can someone help me? When validating, what difference is acceptable between the NIST and the other thermometers, be it the probes in the unit or your own internal thermometers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mollyredone said:

We use 1.0 degree.

Do you really read freezer temps to a tenth of a degree?  A typical freezer temperature recorder chart cannot be read to a tenth of a degree nor can a refrigerator temperature recorder chart be read to a tenth of a degree.

Edited by Dansket
modified sentence
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Dansket said:

Do you really read freezer temps to a tenth of a degree?  A typical freezer temperature recorder chart cannot be read to a tenth of a degree nor can a refrigerator temperature recorder chart be read to a tenth of a degree.

Yes, the digital temperature readout, which is also calibrated, does read out to 0.1 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

We use within 2 C for our freezers, and within 1 C for room temps and refrigerators.

Whatever you use, you must be able to show that whatever you use for documentation (recorder charts or logs), are going to be in compliance within that variance.  


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By maureen320
      Hello All,
      Now that Cerner has migrated from major release upgrades to incremental upgrades, how are you managing the Blood Bank validation effort?
      We have not yet received any guidance from Cerner and at this point we feel that we will need to make the determination to validate on our own.
      How are you some of you handling this?
      Thank you!
      Respectfully yours,
      Maureen Slackway, MS, MT(ASCP), CPHIMS, CQA, CAPM
      Senior Application Analyst – Laboratory Systems, Universal Health Services, Inc.
    • By Beaker
      One of our smaller sites uses a specimen rocker to keep platelets agitated before being transfused.  They do not routinely stock platelets which is why purchasing a platelet incubator/agitator is not on the agenda.  On our last accreditation inspection we were cited for not performing a validation of the rocker for platelet storage.  Has anyone done a validation of this type and could you share the details of how to set this up?
    • By Jermin
      Hi All,
      I am about to venture into performing my first ever validation of a test. I have been tasked to validate Rh+K phenotype testing on the BioRad IH-1000 (two of them). We have been, until now, performing the test manually, but as work is getting busier, performing it on the analyser might prove easier (or at least motivate people to perform phenotype). I have been given advise by my senior on how to go about it:
      Select 10 Donor Red Cell units which have Rh+K phenotype performed Perform the phenotype manually Perform the phenotype on the analyser compare the result pat myself on the back, provided I don't mess it up The issue I have is donor red cells doesn't indicate if they are K+, and I wanted some K+ as well as K-. I could always keep testing a lot of donor units until I come across a K+ unit, but I don't want to was a lot of cards (but that might be my last option). If I choose the NBS or BioRad Antibody Panel Cells, then the issue is the strength of the test cells, as they are, I think, 0.8%, and it does not fully represent the way we perform our phenotype manually, as it uses around 5%. I can always try and make the strength of the solution stronger, that is another option. 
      So this is where I am at. If anyone has a suggestion, or better a complete plan, then I am happy to hear it. Also if there is any point I missed or need clarification, please feel free to ask, I'm fixed to this specific thread all night long.
    • By BloodBankGuy
      We are going to be moving forward with testing cord blood gases.  We currently run venous gases and arterial gases on our ABL 800 series.  Now since a cord gas is still technically a blood specimen, does this require a new set of validation?  We are not running reference ranges with this, so I don't know if that would make a difference.
      Thanks for any input.
    • By sarara26
      I am switching from an Immucor antibody panel to a Quotient antibody panel and need to do a validation.  Does anyone have any suggestions regarding this? How many samples (both pos and neg) I should use or know of any references I can look at?
  • Advertisement

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.