March 2, 20196 yr comment_76102 The DAT is a test to detect either antibodies or complement (or both) on the surface of the red cells that has sensitised the red cells in vivo. Therefore, in a way, the red cells have already been incubated within the body. There is, therefore, no need to incubate ex vivo or in vitro, whichever way you want to put it.
March 3, 20196 yr Author comment_76117 What would happen if you did? What's the chance you would get a false positive DAT?
March 3, 20196 yr comment_76118 It shouldn't cause a false positive, because the plasma would be from the patient, as would the red cells, and so they would be from the same source. However, it is possible that the reaction may be enhanced by more antibody sensitising the red cells, but this would not be a false positive.
March 4, 20196 yr comment_76135 If one is doing a DAT in order to determine the status of a possible acute transfusion reaction, then the presence of antibodies on donor cells is the concern. There may be some use in incubation here to enhance uptake, but I have never heard of it being part of anyone's transfusion work-up procedure. Scott
March 4, 20196 yr comment_76142 Incubating patient plasma with patient red blood cells and then applying the antiglobulin test is no longer a Direct Antiglobulin Test but an Autocontrol test which is an Indirect Antiglobulin Test. Some may think an Autocontrol test gives the same results as a Direct Antiglobulin Test, but that is not always true.
Create an account or sign in to comment