Jump to content

amym1586

Members
  • Posts

    249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by amym1586

  1. On ‎4‎/‎27‎/‎2016 at 7:22 AM, AMcCord said:

    One small thing I've added to the process of receiving reagents is a small self-inking stamp. It has checkboxes for the following: No Product Insert Changes, Change to Product Insert(s) (circle item # on invoice if new insert version), and Supervisor notified if changes to insert version. At the bottom are lines for the received date and tech initials. We have a log for all the important info - what, when, lot#, outdate, looks OK, QC performed, etc. In that log I have a document that lists the current insert version for all the reagents coming in so that the techs can do the insert version check. I keep that list updated and they keep me updated on lot changes. I'm in the process of adding a more detailed procedure for receiving reagents and supplies (trying to keep ahead of the inspection curve!).

    The thing I KNOW I'm going to get complaints about is Ortho doesn't put package inserts in anything anymore. Just instructions on how to look up the package inserts.  But they'll put a notice that they changed something, but they have a notice in their boxes from an updated they made Oct. 2015! 

  2. On ‎5‎/‎4‎/‎2012 at 1:38 PM, SRMC BB said:

    Does your process for SOPs describe how you review SOPs when a new edition of standards is published to ensure you are meeting new/revised standards? Does your SOP for SOPs describe how you check Standards when you write a new SOP to ensure you are meeting current standards? Then, of course, you have to have documentation that the review is performed when a new edition is published.

    We currently do not have any of this in writing, we have the formatting of SOPs and who writes them , reviews them and how they get put into operation.  But not wording on how we are handling new editions of standards.  Could that be part of my corrective action as to why we didn't have a procedure written for a standard ?

  3. 24 minutes ago, David Saikin said:

    If you are having an AABB inspection they should not be using the CAP Standards.  Granted, they are pretty close BUT for AABB you need to be in compliance with AABB Standards.  And if you are, you will be in compliance with CAP (maybe not vice versa).

    I'd call AABB and talk with the I&A folks about your inspector's interps on things esp using the CAP standards . . . The only other regulatory agency I would utilize during an inspection is the FDA.

    Also - become an AABB Assessor.  It's a pretty easy thing to do and will give you a better perspective on that process.

    In one of the emails of hers that I read it had that we requested an AABB and CAP coordinated visit and it enclosed the CAP checklist for her to go over as well.   I'm not sure if that's to keep the blood bank from getting inspected twice or not.

     

    I have looked over some of things involved in becoming an AABB Assessor. I'd love to be able to see how other people do things and steal the good ideas!

  4. 40 minutes ago, mollyredone said:

    I am attaching a copy of our reagent quality assessment. We separate our products specifically and have a binder with all the package inserts and then document lot, receipt, in use, expiration date and inspection. This form goes behind the package insert, so we can see it.

    BB REAGENT LOT.xls

    BB RM Quality Assessment of Received Reagents.doc

    Oh I like the idea of separating the products in a log book with the package inserts!    I might have to steal that idea. :)

  5. Thank you! I know I'll be better at this next time with 2 more years under my belt.   It is hard to sort out some times the inspectors suggestions/ nit pickiness based on actual standards and things we need to change.

     

    We had written that we check the package insert for any changes  but no wording with what the procedure is for if there is a new package insert.  The same for product integrity.  We check to see if the supplies look ok, no damage, spills etc. But no wording as to what we would do if the product was unacceptable.  

     

    They were cross referencing with CAP so sometimes it was also unclear if it was a CAP thing are an AABB thing.

    Kind of hard to see that you have to have a package insert procedure out of "materials shall be received, inspected, and tested, as necessary, before acceptance for use". 

  6. AABB wanted me to change our Supply log.  They wanted a way to document if the supply was unacceptable.  I had to add the In service date.  And they want me to add something to the tune of  whoever received in the supply  is checking it to see if the package insert is the same or has it been updated.  And then some wording in a procedure as to what we do if the package insert is new/updated.

     

    We previously had  OK to signify that we checked the package/  OK that we checked to package insert.    They didn't like that. 

    I attached the one I'm working on but it may need help.

    Any advice/helpful comments?

    BB.F.SUPPLYLOG2.odt

  7. For those of you who still keep paper procedure manuals, I wanted to get some feedback on how your manuals are formatted.

    Currently we have a table of contents then a title page for each procedure followed by the procedure/policy.

    The title page has the name of the procedure/policy, when and who it was written by,   revised date, who approved it and when.  Then several spots for a review name and date for every 2 years when it needs to be reviewed.   Is this the norm?   Or can someone give me an example of how your manuals are formatted.

     

    Thanks!

  8. 20 minutes ago, Malcolm Needs said:

    One non-conformance?  You should be hugely excited, very proud of your staff and yourself, and, in addition, getting yourself around the outside of a very large glass of champagne!  Well done!!

    Oh good! I feel better now.  I think I was being a little too hard on myself.

  9. 6 hours ago, AMcCord said:

    We are currently using Paragon (though not for much longer :clap:) and I bill those extra reference charges manually with a CPT code. It's done in Patient Management under Daily Processing...Activity Posting. I was given access to that one function for billing purposes. It is not difficult to use. Our techs responsible for sendouts and I bill anything that isn't built into the system that way. If it isn't something that is sent out fairly frequently, it doesn't get built. If you can get your business folks to built those tests for you - BONUS!

    Oh great!  I already have access to Activity Posting and have used it to bill for other things in blood bank.  Hope I can try it out soon. We sent a patient out last Friday to the ref lab.

  10. Just added a Positive Thinking Day!  

    I bought everyone a lab themed button to wear.  And everyone has to be positive.  If you catch someone being negative you get to take their button.  At the end of the shift whoever has to most buttons will win a prize.  I think I'll do this on day 1 to start off lab week on a positive note!

  11. Our Anti-Leb antisera was expired and thrown away.  Our normal supplier is on back order for 3 months. 

    I want to switch suppliers anyhow.   How can I bring in a new anti-sera without doing correlations ?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.