Jump to content

MAGNUM

Members
  • Posts

    393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by MAGNUM

  1. We as a lab used to use the FreshLoc system, but found that it was too unreliable for our puposes. In fact I had a CAP surveyor ask me if I would rather remove it from her sight and only use thermometer temps or receive a deficiency because the temperature system "missed" temperatures. 

  2. We instituted the practice of retyping the patients if their histories could not be proven. To do so, we instituted the practice of performing the retypes on a different specimen collected at a different time within the previous 24 hrs or within 1 hr of the blood type verification in the LIS. The histories are checked on every patient in the blood bank, if they do not have a historical type, the phlebotomist is sent to the patient room to collect a new lavender top tube. It does not matter the type of the patient, if they have no history, they get retyped. This practice ties into CAP TRM.30575. We have actually "caught" incorrect collections by the RN's that collected the incorrect patient and labeled the specimen with the wrong patient information.

    This is our practice and we are sticking to it!

     

    The other Scott

  3. 6 hours ago, AuntiS said:

    Just curious... how does that work in the US? Who pays for the testing on the cord blood that you would not normally have tested but now must because of that neonatologist?  Does the patient get billed?

    The patient gets billed, even though we can make the case for unnecessary testing.

  4. We used to perform only those cords from O mothers, Rh negative mothers, and mothers with significant antibodies. The optimal phrase is used to. We had a neonatologist that pitched a fit and went to administration, and long story short we now do ALL cord bloods.

  5. You could just southern engineer a probe with a diluent pickup probe and some flexible tubing from your hematology department. In fact the some hematology analyzers have a diluent pickup that is exactly like that, they even have a metal band on the end to keep it at the bottom of the cube of diluent.

  6. On ‎2‎/‎14‎/‎2017 at 7:15 AM, BankerGirl said:

    This subject came up recently at our facility and it was decided by our Patient Safety Committee, of which I am a member, that the co-signer would need to be qualified to administer blood.  This means, RNs, Perfusionists and Anesthesiologists.  The thought process was that if the co-signer is not qualified to administer blood, then they would not be knowledgeable enough to know exactly what they were verifying.

    This is the same policy that we follow, although we do allow the patient physician to check also. Plus, I only allow RN's, MD's, and the anesthesia techs from the Heart OR to pick it up, in my opinion if they can't transfuse it they should not pick it up (minus the anesthesia techs).

  7. I think that it is a piece of expensive junk. I am trying to get our biomed to kill it so that I can order a helmer washer.  I have already gotten a quote and it is actually cheaper to go with the Helmer rather than the Sorvall, and the Helmer is a much better quality instrument.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.