Jump to content

Can someone help me? Antibody screen is positive


trisram

Recommended Posts

Here's the scenerio:

I got an order for 2 units of blood. I do a ABORH and then an Ab screen. The screen is positive. What do I do next?

Can you tell me if my steps here listed are correct?

1) First I do an antibody panel

2) After I do my first panel, I still have a few antibodies not ruled out, but I have one antibody that I have ruled in Anti-K

3) Then look into our inventory to find two units there are K antigen negative

4) Then I crossmatch the 2 units and do Ab screens on both of them

5) as the units screens are incubating, I do a 2nd Ab panel with prior used panel reagents to rule out all the antibodies I didn't rule out the first time

6) Then I keep doing this until I ruled out everything

7) as soon as all my rule outs are done, then my units will be ready to issue.

Does this sound like an efficient way of going about this problem? Or is there something I can add or correct to make this as quickly and efficient as possible?

Thank you for your time.

T. Ramon, MT(ASCP)

PS.

Usually, I work core lab and microbiology, but they have me working in blood bank, and I am still trying to work out stuff. Thank you for your time.

Edited by trisram
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your Step #4 has a problem, but I think it may just be how you worded it. For Step #4, instead of saying "do Ab screens on both units", did you really mean "do special antigen typings on both units to make sure they lack the antigen" (if you did not have donor units in your inventory that were already tested as K Negative)?

(It is not necessary to perform antibody screens on donor units that have already been tested by the collection facility.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4) Then I crossmatch the 2 units and do Ab screens on both of them

5) as the units screens are incubating, I do a 2nd Ab panel with prior used panel reagents to rule out all the antibodies I didn't rule out the first time

6) Then I keep doing this until I ruled out everything

7) as soon as all my rule outs are done, then my units will be ready to issue.

At step four, the units need to be Kell typed and crossmatched. At steps five and six, just a few cells can be picked out that rule out all other antibodies. Usually patient is Kell typed as well, to verify that he/she is in fact Kell negative. (This step only if they haven't been transfused in the last 90 days and may have donor blood in their system) Then when your ag neg units are crossmatch compatible, you're done!:)

Hope that helps--

Jennifer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tristram,

Please could you tell me what you were able to rule out with your first panel, and what you were trying to rule out with your second?

This is quite important information to know before making any suggestions.

Thanks.

Well, I just needed to get a general idea on how to go about issuing donot units if the patient/recipient has a positive Ab screen. So far I haven't caused any hemolytic transfusion reactions ... Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>to verify that he/she is in fact Kell negative. (This step only if they haven't been transfused in the last 90 days and may >have donor blood in their system)

Thanks for this info. I had been asking some coworkers about this and have an answer now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Disclaimer: I'm new to BBing as well.

I discovered recently that antigen typing can also be helpful even if the patient has been transfused in the past 90 days. A couple of weeks ago I ag typed a patient for three antigens as a routine part of identifying new antibodies in our laboratory. (I can't recall which but I think that one was anti-c.) I was having trouble obtaining probability for two of the suspected antibodies and wasn't aware until after I performed the typing that the patient had received a transfusion about two months prior. The ag typing was clearly negative for one ag and mixed field (with a small positive population) for the other two. I was able to not only feel confident that the patient was probably negative for those antigens, but also able to presume that the transfusions they'd receive were positive for those antigens - bolstering the possibility that they were now forming those antibodies. The sample was later also sent for a bioarray to get a complete antigen type by molecular methods and I left the results open until they'd been reviewed by a specialist. I probably wouldn't have ag-typed had I known about the transfusion but now I think that those results were helpful at that moment in trying to decide if that patient needed to receive units that were negative for those antigens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.