Posted January 8, 201213 yr comment_41184 Newborn: full term, resp distress post meconium aspiration- solid phase aby screen is positive and antibody id is positive across the board. tube dat/auto control are negative. requested a second sample and had same results.negative maternal history- aside from RhIg rec'd 4 months prior. same blood type as baby. any ideas for reactivity?
January 13, 201213 yr comment_41295 Did you test the baby's plasma uing tube and/or gel. I have heard of a 20 day old infant making an Anti-KIgM in nature due to an E.coli infection.
January 20, 201213 yr comment_41477 Why are you antibody screening newborns out of curiosity? A cord sample for a group and a maternal sample for antibody screen is recommended, but only if the baby is for transfusion. There is no need to antibody screen a newborn as you are effectively just testing the mother...As for why the baby shows it but the mother doesn't? The Placenta actively transports antibodies across resulting in a (usually) higher titre in the baby than the mother. Maybe the mother does have the antibody but in too low a titre to be detected.
January 20, 201213 yr comment_41482 Another thought... Could the positive reaction have been due to Wharton's jelly?
January 25, 201213 yr comment_41609 Hi Auntie-DSometimes mom's sample is not available and it is perfectly acceptable to perform screen on baby's sample even if mom is around. JBWhy are you antibody screening newborns out of curiosity? A cord sample for a group and a maternal sample for antibody screen is recommended, but only if the baby is for transfusion. There is no need to antibody screen a newborn as you are effectively just testing the mother...As for why the baby shows it but the mother doesn't? The Placenta actively transports antibodies across resulting in a (usually) higher titre in the baby than the mother. Maybe the mother does have the antibody but in too low a titre to be detected.
February 6, 201213 yr comment_41803 Hi Auntie-DSometimes mom's sample is not available and it is perfectly acceptable to perform screen on baby's sample even if mom is around. JBWhat I meant though was there is no requirement to do a back type or antibody screen on a neonate unless for transfusion - it is a pointless excercise...
February 6, 201213 yr comment_41807 There have been reports of positive Capture-R Ready Screen and Read-ID reactions (positive in all wells) due to antibody binding to cryptic RBC membrane antigens exposed in the RBC membrane drying process and to components in the Capture-LISS dye component) reagent. What to IAT in tube or gel indicate? These Capture problems do not occur in the other test procedures, and while rare, should be considered a limitation due to the time and effeort needed to resolve the problem. Were all screen/ID test wells the same reaction strength, and how strong were the reactions?
February 6, 201213 yr comment_41823 Having worked with Solid phase long enough I would first suspect junk reactivity and test in the tube with LISS. If that is negative I'd call this a negative screen. If you get something there then it's possible that what someone above suggested - the titer in the mother is just too low to detect and you are picking something up in the infant.
February 7, 201213 yr comment_41832 I would be interested in finding out what your final conclusions were. Sounded like junk reactivity maybe due to the infection. Were tube reactions neg? We also use baby's sample routinely for newborn type and crossmatch even if Mom is available. Only use mom if more sample is needed for antibody ID then what one can get from a newborn (usually a tiny preemie in the NICU).
February 7, 201213 yr comment_41833 We also use baby's sample routinely for newborn type and crossmatch even if Mom is available.Poor baby Why put the poor mite through the trauma if you don't need to? We take a cord sample at birth then crossmatch against a maternal sample if crossmatch is needed. I will add again that a newborn antibody screen/crossmatch is not required at birth as all the antibodies are maternal...Also you are more likely to get a decent sample from the mother, than a traumatic heel-*****. Which, I would like to add, saves events from happening like the OP described.
February 7, 201213 yr comment_41835 Poor baby Why put the poor mite through the trauma if you don't need to? We take a cord sample at birth then crossmatch against a maternal sample if crossmatch is needed. I will add again that a newborn antibody screen/crossmatch is not required at birth as all the antibodies are maternal...Also you are more likely to get a decent sample from the mother, than a traumatic heel-*****. Which, I would like to add, saves events from happening like the OP described.These generally are not heel sticks but are drawn from a line. We do not crossmatch the infant, only a type and screen until 4 months old. Then reserve a unit and its good until it outdates. I think it probably started that way at this facility because so many babies in our NICU are referrals. We use gel and really do not use very much sample to do the TSG. This was also pretty much the same way we handled it when I worked in Boston.
February 7, 201213 yr comment_41837 heel-*****.Sorry to "hijack" this thread, as it were, but is it just me, or do these automatic "*****"s draw attention to a word with a double meaning, when only the "clean" meaning was meant? In other words, they emphasise the double meaning, rather than "dilute" it, thus defeating the object in the first place.:angered::angered:
Create an account or sign in to comment