Jump to content

Neonatal Transfusion of Rh Neg baby with passive Anti c


Terry Butler

Recommended Posts

We recently had a baby born to woman with an allo anti little c. We believe the baby is Rh negative but weak D status has not been confirmed due to a positive DAT (2+). The Rh control tube and the weak D tube were equal in strength to the DAT. The cord cells were typed as litle c positive. If the baby is confirmed to have passive anti c by antibody screening and required a red cell transfusion, would it be acceptable to transfuse Rh positive RBCs that lack the little c antigen because formation of an allo anti D is unlikely? Is anyone aware of plasma exchange being used as a method for removal of maternal antibody in a neonate? Thanks for any thoughts you may have.

 

Terry :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be unlikely that the infant is D-negative.  If the mother has an anti-c, she is most likely an R1R1 so would be contributing an Rh-pos gene to the infant.  I realize the mother could be an R1r' so it is possible the infant could be D-negative.  With that said, a plasma exchange is generally an automated procedure so is not really feasible on a neonate.  The bulk of any passive antibody is attached to the RBC so it's more important to remove the sensitized RBCs which will be the source of the bilirubin.  It would also be very difficult to obtain a Red Cell unit that is D-negative and c-negative.  So has you mentioned, you could use D-positive, c-negative whole blood for the exchange or use D-negative, c-positive units and anticipate performing multiple exchanges if necessary.  Whether the infant is a male or female may also influence your decision.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a mom once with anti-c and I remember planning what I could do if the baby were Rh neg.  It turned out to be!  Fortunately, no transfusion was required for the baby.  I agree with SMW above.  I would have a hard time giving D pos to a baby girl, but if someone could convince me that was better than c+ in the presence of anti-c, I would go that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.