Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Would anyone care to weigh in on the pros and cons of softbank?  We currently use a different bloodbank system for Tranfusion and our donor services and product manufacturing.  Does anyone have experience with the Soft System vein to vein on a large scale, including mobiles? 

I would take any comments. Message me privately if you don't care to share publicly.  :)


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used multiple systems for Transfusion and not so many on the donor side: Sunquest, Cerner, Soft, Meditech, Progesa. Soft is one of the better ones and Meditech is one of the worst. Haven't used Soft on the donor side so cannot comment on that.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've been on SoftBank for 6 years and find it as good as any.  Obviously every system has it's good and bad points.  I personally think it's light years ahead of the Cerner it replaced.  We do not use the donor module. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

For those that answered, I am curious as to how many units you transfuse on an annual basis?  Also, are you doing any product manufacturing?  Thanks.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone used a SafeTrace (donor or tx) Product, then switched to Soft?  Pros-Cons?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By maybe
      My hospital recently went live with EPIC’s BPAM module, because of which we had to increase the amount of data being sent across the interface (more OBX segments cross into EPIC for the patient/product matching aspect).
      The Transfusion Service uses Softbank and we've discovered one the main Soft interfaces into EPIC can only process so many lines of data at one time. How did we discover this?  We broke the interface! One massively transfused patient sent across so much data that it crashed.
      Soft is currently working on a fix for this, but the main workaround they gave is to limit the number of products you can crossmatch/dispense on each order (recommended max =16) and create a new order when that amount is exceeded.
      For most patients this isn’t a problem, however I am at a loss for what to do with the massive bleeders. In order to be electronically crossmatched the red cell product needs to be on the same order number as the Type and Screen. So when a liver transplant takes a turn for the worse and you transfuse 80 crossmatched red cell units emergently, what do you do? It seems ethically wrong to flip to the uncrossmatched status just because the software doesn't like more than 16 units on one order. Another suggestion was to create "fake" type and screen specimens for each set of 16 units, which also doesn't sit well with me.
      Does anyone else have Soft and come across this problem?
    • By gene20354
      Currently my lab is using Cerner Millennium.   We are being asked to look at new Blood Bank LIS systems because the rest of the lab is going to Epic Beaker.   I have seen demos of Haemonetics SafeTrace and Mediware HCLL.    I am also trying to get one with Soft scheduled.     I am seeking advice from current users of` these systems.
      Are you happy with your BB LIS?  
      If given the chance to change to another would you?    
      Any additional advice is appreciated.
    • By lmiranda
      We are in the process of narrowing our new Blood Bank software down to Softbank or SafeTrace Tx frm Haemonetics. Our new LIS system will be Beaker (our current EHR is Epic). We have heard pros and cons about both systems and are interested in users giving us feedback on their thoughts, especially if they have Softbank as a standalone (i.e., not part of the entire LIS system). All information is welcome.
    • By apfelblosm
      My hospital just expanded and opened another hospital.  The laboratories are separate, however we are all in the same lab system.  The system recognizes the 2 different sites, but everyone has access to both sites results.
      My question is, does anyone else have this?  I feel like there is a HIPAA issue here.  I have worked at two other organizations that had multiple entities and I have never had access to the other labs' results, unless I had access to an EMR and then I could see the results there, but never in my lab system.
      I can only enter things into the other sites if I move the specimen and receive it into the other site, but just having access when many of us don'r work over there seems like a problem to me.  Also, because we are linked, the system doesn't recognize that a type and screen done at the other site doesn't apply to my site.
      Thoughts?  Experiences?
    • By gilmanch
      Hi everyone,
      Our hopsital is in the process of FINALLY implementing a BB module. No more testing book! We have Meditech as our Lab LIS and hospital. So our options are Meditech BB module and Softbank. The IT staff here would love for us to just get the Meditech since interface would not be needed and familar to the staff. I have looked at reviews for both Meditech and Softbank, and saw demos of both. I lean toward the Softbank. The ITstaff is not 100% against Softbank, but want to have good reasons such as areas where Meditech lacks and Softbank has those options. So any feedback on this would be great. And anyone out there who has Meditech LIS who got the Softbank, how did your interface integration go?
      Thank you!
  • Advertisement

  • Site Suggestions

    Site Feedback & Suggestions

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.