:bonk:I have been through exactly what you are going through, only in reverse. I am the supervisor of a Blood Bank that historically only accepted BB specimens that were drawn or witnessed by a Blood Banker. This was established by my predecessor. I was told it was in reaction to WBIT many years ago. I was also in charge of the phlebotmists for a LONG 10 years and was very aware of the problems that occur in that group, so I continued with that policy. As our staffing kept decreasing continiously, my lab manager decided that the phlebotomists should be trained to draw BB specimens. I was very fearful at first. I decided that the phlebotomists with a proven track record of no patient misidentifications and some experience would be trained. I must admit that it has worked out very well for more than 5 years. At our current staffing levels, there is no way the BB techs could draw or witness all specimen procurements now., nor do most of them have the skill set to draw sucessfully. I personally train them most of the time , emphasizing the importance of the patient identification. I also monitor "smaller issues" like no date and time, etc. as part of the QA program and report my findings to their supervisor and to them. Even a Blood Banker could make a mistake, but it is probably less likely. Good luck.