Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/22/2018 in Posts

  1. I would just like to add another comment to this discussion. CAT is NOT the best method for looking for weak ABO antigens or antibodies.
    2 points
  2. I would read the actual OSHA regulations, there are a lot of statements in there about "reasonable expectation of exposure". https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/bloodbornepathogens/bloodborne_quickref.html Be sure to read the definitions and don't implement rules for a research lab or micro/viro lab that don't apply to blood bank. This whole subject is one of my pet peeves, I would vote for common sense and don't lick anything in the lab!
    2 points
  3. Here's a easy read version of the Transfusion Safety Officer job description at our facility. Hope it gives you an idea of what might be possible at other facilities. TSO JOB DESCRIP.doc
    2 points
  4. There is a huge price difference between cryo and fibrinogen concentrates, maybe that has something to do with it.
    1 point
  5. We do have a NICU and have still had cases where they couldn't wait for the aliquot to be prepared, so we gave them the freshest O Neg that we had on the shelf.
    1 point
  6. I used to use a 10mL tigertop tube, it was an excellent brake!
    1 point
  7. Yes, that's true, Malcolm. On the other hand, if you test with 2 different monoclonal anti-A reagents (and an anti-AB for good measure - a real one not an A+B) and they all come up 4+, I think it's fairly safe to say that the patient is a group A. I think that giving group O blood in this case is both wasteful of group O blood (unless you are swimming in it) and overkill
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.