Jump to content

danlmark

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States
  1. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  2. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  3. I just answered this question. My Score FAIL  
  4. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  5. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  6. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  7. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  8. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  9. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  10. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  11. I just answered this question. My Score PASS  
  12.    R1R2 reacted to a post in a topic: SEMIANNUAL PATIENT COMPARISON - NON WAIVED
  13. After validation studies are done, why wouldn't one or two comparisons be sufficient?
  14.    LaurelMae reacted to a post in a topic: Corrected Hgb and Simple Math for Lipemiia
  15. Laurel, The presenter for the webinar you cited wrote our hemoglobin correction procedure. There are successive steps in the procedure where a plasma blank and a plasma replacement are done if the prior step do not return an MCHC < 37.0. I'm not sure why she designed it that way but I suspect that anytime you manipulate the specimen there is a possibility that error can be introduced into the end result. Which may be why she favors the calculation because no sample dilution or other error can occur there. Dan
  16. It's probably good to remember that everyone's critical highs and lows are different based on practice preferences. At the oncology practice where I work, the critical low WBC is 1.0 K/uL and the high is 100 K/uL. I can say that I've never seen this phenomenon, neupogen or not.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.