Jump to content
May 2024 Challenge

Malcolm Needs

Supporting Members ☆
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,497

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    997

  • Country

    United Kingdom

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Malcolm Needs

  1. Malcolm Needs
    I hope that the ED doc was thoroughly ashamed; but I have my doubts! :(
  2. Malcolm Needs
    Well, nobody is perfect. The difference is that most people that work in blood transfusion are prepared to admit it (unlike some other health professionals - and I use the term "professionals" in its loosest sense here). :(:(
  3. Malcolm Needs
    Also excellent points.
  4. Malcolm Needs
    All very good points.
  5. Malcolm Needs
    Yes, we do that too (in fact the new/revised bits are highlighted on all copies, including the master), but we have a Task-based Training Record Sheet that has to be signed off by the trainer, as well as the trainee (part of the Good Manufacturing Practice insisted upon by the EU Blood Directive). However, once these are all signed off (1 month maximum) the paper copies have to be destroyed and only electronic copies are available. This, apparently, is so old copies cannot be used. The trouble is, of course, that people keep their own photocopies or scraps pf paper as an aide memoire. The other two problems come when we haven't performed a procedure for ages, and the computer is down, or you can't remember the exact title or document number. You put in a key word, and about a 1000 documents come up. :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
  6. Malcolm Needs
    Yes, you are quite right in what you say. :D:D:D
  7. Malcolm Needs
    Well, it is rare (extremely rare), but it could be that the child was a D Neg chimera (as a result on conjoined twins) who had fully absorbed the twin (who was D Pos) and that the maternal anti-D wiped out the D Pos clone. This is nothing more than an unlikely, but possible, explanation. The DNA profile from his leukocytes would be interesting, one way or the other. :confused::confused:
  8. Malcolm Needs
    Not if you use monoclonal IgM anti-D reagents.
  9. Malcolm Needs
    Yes, when we issue blood as "suitable for", we always warn that the blood should be transfused slowly and that observation of the patient during the transfusion is of paramount importance (not that it isn't anyway, but you know what I mean). :):)
  10. Malcolm Needs
    Sorry to be a pain, but could you explain this a bit more please? Do you mean post-Rhogam, or just drop the screen full-stop? :confused:
  11. Malcolm Needs
    Is the blood used for an IUT not irradiated to prevent this (and TA-GvHD) happening??????????? :eek::eek:
  12. Malcolm Needs
    Yes, I agree with you Kate that everyone reports to someone else, and from a Managerial point if view, I think that this is right. What worries me, and I think a lot of others working in Blood Transfusion Laboratories in many hospitals in the UK, including some very big teaching hospitals, is that the person running the Blood Bank is not only managerially subordinate to the person running Haematology, but is also often subordinate to them on a technical level. As I said in an earlier post, herein lies the problem, because some of these people, with very little knowledge of blood transfusion (and that often learned many, many years previously) do tend to interfere and throw their weight around in the Blood Transfusion Laboratory itself, when the person in charge of this Laboratory knows a great deal more about the subject, and is usually very much more up to date with their knowledge. :(:(
  13. Malcolm Needs
    Well, actually, we do too at the Reference Laboratory. It's on the grounds that we never believe anyone else's results but our own, and if the patient has been recently transfused and we get a mixed-field reaction with anti-D, we will report it as "D??". :redface::redface:
  14. Malcolm Needs
    I agree, but in this case it did not take a lot of thinking to know that the procedure invented by the Medical Director made no sense whatsoever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eek::eek:
  15. Malcolm Needs
    If we are cross-matching for a patient with a low-frequency antigen or a patient with WAIHA or CHAD, where we actually find the cross-match compatible, we will call the cross-match "compatible". If we are cross-matching for a patient with WAIHA or CHAD, where the cross-match itself is either incompatible, or we are cross-matching with adsorbed plasma, or we are cross-matching for a patient with an antibody against a high-frequency antigen, such as anti-Kna, where we know that there are no clinically-significant atypical alloantibodies present, we will use the term "blood suitable for...Joe Doe...". There was an excellent editorial by Lawrie Petz a few years ago on this subject, which is still very valid and worth a read. Petz L. "Least incompatible" units for transfusion in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: should we eliminate this meaningless term? A commentary for clinicians and transfusion medicine professionals. Transfusion 2003; 24: 1503-1507. :):)
  16. Malcolm Needs
    1. At least one, if not more (it's national). 2. Once a day (in the early hours, between about 01.00hrs and 02.00hrs - which is a real pain in the b*m if you are trying to issue a cross-match, because at thet time of the morning, it's got to be urgent, otherwise we wouldn't be doing it, usually involves a bleeding liver transplant with 5 antibodies minimum, and, because we then have to issue by hand-written compatibility labels, usually involves a Sri Lankan name - but hey, it's got to be done some time, and that is the time when the computer is least used)!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 3. I'm not sure, but I think none (I think, which is always dangerous, that the server writes to a tape/CD-ROM, or whatever the IT bods use, all the time). :):)
  17. Malcolm Needs
    Excellent points Carol. :):)
  18. Malcolm Needs
    Only if the case is on computer already. If the patient is new, or was wrongly grouped before, or the present or previous sample was taken from the wrong patient, or the unit were incorrectly grouped, then NO!
  19. Malcolm Needs
    In turn, I see from where you are coming Steve, but I would argue that Agenda for Change should have sorted out these discrepancies, but recognise that this has, in no way, happened. :(
  20. Malcolm Needs
    I absolutely, utterly and completely agree with both you and L106 concerning these sentiments. There is NO logic to this whatsoever. :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
  21. Malcolm Needs
    You could try telling the physician that any blood issued to the patient is issued as uncross-matched if they do not provide a second sample, and that they are, therefore responsible if there is any reaction, and follow this up in writing so that you are legally covered. You may well have to have the backing of your Medical Director, but if he/she is worth his/her salt, you should get this without question. My experience is that the very thought that the physician may actually be held responsible for their actions in relation to a blood transfusion, particularly one involving uncross-matched blood, works wonders!!!!! :confused::confused:
  22. Malcolm Needs
    I can assure you that Steve is one of the good ones! I know that money isn't everything (although, of course, it helps!), but what really annoys me as much as the non-blood banker bosses who override (or try to) those of us who know a bit about it, but the fact that they also, very often, get paid considerably more than the most senior person in the blood bank, because they "have to look after blood bank too". In many hospitals in the UK, the person in charge of blood bank reaches a "glass ceiling" in terms of pay, because they will never be able to reach the level of the most senior member of staff in haematology, chemical pathology, microbiology, histology, etc, etc. :angered::eek::boo::angered: (JUST) ONE OF MY PET MOANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  23. Malcolm Needs
    We bought our 10-year-old son Harry a DVD called "Addams Family Values" for Christmas (amongst the rest of what was on sale in Croydon - my wife Dee did the shopping!!!!!!!). In this, their daughter Wednesday smiles at one point. She scared everyone by doing this. I really cannot think what brought this scene to mind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :confuse::confuse:
  24. Malcolm Needs
    To follow up my own post (sorry), I will give an example. During my career, I have had the misfortune to have dealt with at least five major incidents. These included three bombs, when the IRA were operating in London, and two train crashes. On the fourth occasion, despite the fact that I was nominally in charge of the Blood Bank, the person in charge of Haematology (who was my line manager, and who knew basic blood transfusion, but who had never dealt with a major incident in his life) happened to be around, and "took charge". I cannot give too many details, otherwise personal identities would be revealed, but suffice it to say, the result was near chaos, and the victims survived "despite", rather than "because of". This sounds very egocentric on my behalf (for which I apologise), but it was, nevertheless, true. :mad::mad::mad::mad:
  25. Malcolm Needs
    Eh? Can I have that in writing?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D:D:D:D
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.