Jump to content

bpkelly

Members - Bounced Email
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by bpkelly

  1. Policies need to be set at system level for Patient identification and specimen labeling. Our system allows preop draws at one of our facilities for surgery/transfusion at another system facility. Registration is the biggest impediment and results in a lot of testing being done "on paper" and then entered into the correct admission once the patient is registered. If anything in the patient registration is a mis- match, Type and screen is redrawn.

  2. We have a policy and procedure for supplier selection in our QS manual. Alot of it revolves around the policies and procedures from Materials Management. We developed a form to send to the manufacturer that includes all of their regualtory information. We went back a did this retrospectively when we implemented our Quality Plan.

  3. This has nothing to do with manufacturing a product. If you issue a product that does not meet the requirements it should have for the patient (ie. pt needed CMV- and you issued a non CMV_ unit) this is a BPDR. If you have a policy for a second check and a product was issued before the second check was done- this is a BPDR.

  4. I agree- the standard applies to antibody detection on antibody identification. Whenever I get cited for an issue like this I call CAP directly and ask for clarification. In most instances you have an over zealous CAP inspector.

  5. WE dropped weak D testing on all patient's except babies of Rh negative mothers years ago and have not seen an increase in Rh negative patients. There just aren't that many weak D people out there to justify doing weak D just to save a few Rh neg units. That is an old tired worn out excuse not to let go of the past. Time to move on.

  6. The second label check does not imply that a second person check the label- only that you have a process to verify the label for accuracy a second time before the label is placed on the unit. We accomplish this by pulling the number up in the computer and checking the label against the computer screen before we place the label on the unit.

  7. Please contact your AABB board member and encourage them the reinstate the funding for the spring IRL conference. For manyof us, this is the only conference we go to since by June, our travel budgets are cut and the AABB annual meeting is not an option. The IRL conference, as far as I am concerned, is the best deal out there. Please write or call you AABB board member today!!!

  8. WE just use separate coolers- we are issuing 5 LPRBC, 5 plasma and a platelet. WE don't generally keep thawed plasma so yes- is goes out after the LPRBC. Our physicians usually tell us not to send the platelets right away. We also issue Factor 7 as part of out massive protocol.

  9. We use several methods depending on what is available. If we have historical information, that serves as a second check. If there is a properly labeled specimen in the main lab that was drawn at another time we use that. If neither of those options work, we have a second sample drawn specifically for us. We have been doing this for 3 years and it works like a charm.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.