fletob

Weekly ultrasounds and nst thru biweekly appts. Most recent ultrasound showed no signs of hydrops or any other issues thankfully, aside from 1.7 MoM, next day another ultrasound MoM dropped to 1.3. Could need IUT Between now (32 weeks) and 34 weeks depending on how these numbers change, after that will just induce if needed, will be induced before 37 weeks for sure at Mfm hospital with nicu. Re-ran titer - 1:256 (said they don’t dilute further beyond this). Given it was negative at 13 weeks, they have no idea how it happened given it was previously negative and no reason for it to have ever be

Since they have given rhogam since the original sample will taking another sample tell them anything? Or will they have to do multiple to compare?

I am the patient in this case. Rhogam was 100% given after the blood was drawn and had never been given before that day.

Thanks! That makes me feel better. Of course when I google everything about severe brain damage and death comes up so it is terrifying. I definitely did not mean to insult all lab professionals. I just know a lab professional in the area where I live (super rural USA) who frequently complains about his coworkers messing up their work and he has to fix it. I was also questioning maybe it was a mixup just because it didn’t make sense for it to happen at this time and it looked like they didn’t read that the shot was given after, not before, given that was what they attributed it to in

Now there is another note in my chart referring to Antibody S? What is the difference between Antibody S and Antibody D? Is one worse than the other?

Thanks for the response! I read about weak d so didn’t know if that could be a cause for the result or even a possibility. They are considering it a rare occurrence. The rhogam was 100% given after the blood draw and had never been given to me before. This doctor seems very experienced but I will see at the ultrasound if mfm is also as concerned. Can they do an accurate titre now since the rhogam has since been given? It was 100% given right AFTER the blood draw? What I also find interesting is with how rare this is to begin with even for a second

Posted 1 minute ago Help make sense of possibilities and if this is something to be of concern or not or if it could be a false positive: first pregnancy due in August - no previous miscarriages no blood transfusions etc. 2011 college class - did a lab and blood type was A+ (could have easily messed this up) feb 2020 pregnancy appt tested A- and negative for antibodies (13 weeks pregnant) June 2020 pregnancy appt tested A- but

Help make sense of possibilities and if this is something to be of concern or not or if it could be a false positive: first pregnancy due in August - no previous miscarriages no blood transfusions etc. 2011 college class - did a lab and blood type was A+ (could have easily messed this up) feb 2020 pregnancy appt tested A- and negative for antibodies (13 weeks pregnant) June 2020 pregnancy appt tested A- but positive for “Passive anti D” antibodies (29 weeks pregnant) NOTE: doctors are super concerned and sending for ultrasound. Lab ju

Help make sense of possibilities and if this is something to be of concern or not or if it could be a false positive: first pregnancy due in August - no previous miscarriages no blood transfusions etc. 2011 college class - did a lab and blood type was A+ (could have easily messed this up) feb 2020 pregnancy appt tested A- and negative for antibodies (13 weeks pregnant) June 2020 pregnancy appt tested A- but positive for “Passive anti D” antibodies (29 weeks pregnant) NOTE: doctors are super concerned and sending for ultrasound. Lab ju