Jump to content

frequency of antibody identifications


suhu

Recommended Posts

My question is directed at those of you doing electronic crossmatching. In our instituion, patients with positive antibody screens due to "clinically not significant (CINS)" antibodies qualify for electronic xm. Some of these antibodies are IgM's, others are who-knows-what. But other times, CINS present as a "real" antibody on subsequent workups, or the patient just develops a real antibody in addition.

We have a fairly high number of "clinically not significant" antibody screens with our automated testing (who-knows-what). For patients with positve antibody screens due to a previous identified CINS, we are debating doing panels each time vs. full AHG crossmatches.

The situation is frustrating, as the idea behind the CINS was to allow electronic crossmatching when insignificant antibodies such as Lewis, cold autos etc... ,are present. However, with automated testing, the antibody screen will often be postive in these cases.

I'm interested in knowing how often you are repeating panel work-ups in this situation (CINS)? Do you do full crossmatches on all these patients also?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we are not required to do full crossmatches unless there is a history of, or a current, clinically significant antibody.

a patient qualifies for an electronic crossmatch if the antibody screen is positive, but the identitfied antibody is not clinically significant. I'm just curious what others are doing. Since there is no serologic crossmatching, how often are antibody workups being repeated in these situations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are not sure what the antibody is, we assume it may be clinically significant. We do IgG crossmatches on these patients. If the antibody screen comes up positive we repeat the panel; every three days if need be. If the patient has a history of an NSA (non-specific antibody), and the screen is now negative, we still do IgG crossmatches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bob, I think that's the shortest response you've ever given. :D

If we get "who-knows-what" antibodies we will try to identify everytime we get a positive screen with this patient. It is not unusual for an antibody early in it's develpment to not really know what it's going to be when it grows up so the next time you test the patient the antibody may have had time to mature into it's recognizable state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

try other methods , other reagents, and storage of reagents may make a difference, think out of the box

like gel igg cards work better stored at room temp

etc

otherwise, we do what Cathy does, Igg xmatch, gives us peace of mind

Edited by LABKING
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.