We've used the AutoVue since 2004, and the upgraded Innova since 2006. In Australia, the casstte columns use glass beads, not gel As we went straight from tube to automation with the AutoVue, can only comment from this perspective- Advantages: *standardised test reporting *cassette images stored and viewable on PC - Windows based *very easy to use - training time minimal *reaction from interference cold aggs, rouleaux almost eliminated *increased safety to user-no glassware, sytem fully enclosed *load and walk away - free up staff to do other tasks *software package - Resolvigen- for antibody ID with education / info re ID'd antibody *can interface to LIS Disadvantages : *Group interpretaion of AB patients recently transfused with multipe grp A red cells is poor - fwd group can appear as B: reaction flagged as forward & reverse typing mis-match - all these we resolve in tube. All our group mis-matched stem cell tx patients are grouped in tube & not on AV. *Stat samples not truly handled as stat - AV schedules samples in batches i.e stat sample not immediately addressed once on board *Large fluidic resevoirs not housed - stored under intrument with multiple tubing threaded through the outside of the intrument; messy looking Hope this is useful