I was not the supervisor when our Transfusion Committee was formed. It was added onto the Tissue Committee to become the Tissue and Transfusion Committee since no one thought the physicians would attend two meetings. The committee was formed as a peer review and as such, the pathologist giving the tissue report is on the committee. The Transfusion Service Supervisor (me) does the Blood Utilization report but is not a member of the committee. I am considered a "presenter" because I am not a physician. The QI person who performs the chart audits for compliance with transfusion triggers and appropriate use is also a "presenter" and is not on the committee (again not a physician). This has not particularly been an issue, but recently during a discussion of blood supplier issues and transfusion committee functions, it was pointed out that I am not a member (I also need to be on quality committees for my CQA continuing ed credits). I told my lab director if I am not permitted to speak at this committee, I need a different committee for the Transfusion Service. At the current time we submit patient safety issues to Risk Management and utilization issues to the Tissue and Transfusion Committee. I believe we need a committee for blood bank that addresses all issues regarding the Transfusion Service and blood products. According to several references that I have consulted, including "The Transfusion Committee" by Ira Shulman, AABB Press, the committee should be multidisciplinary, not just physicians. The letters to physicians can still come from the committee chair, who is a physician. What do you think of this design? Is the Blood Bank supervisor or manager on your committee?