Hmmmmmmmmmm, that makes life more difficult! If the mixed-field reactions were only seen in the ABO typing, that would be fairly easy to explain. As they are in the Rh type as well, the explanation may be much more difficult, not least because Rh antigens are proteins, and so are fully expressed at birth.
I just wonder if, in the cases you see, there is a noticeable difference between the D type of the mother and the baby. For example, is the mother D Positive and the baby mostly D Negative, with just a few D Positive red cells in evidence? This could be explained by there having been a foeto-maternal haemorrhage, largely from the maternal circulation to the foetal circulation. Obviously, If the mother is D Negative and the baby types mostly as D Positive, with just a few D Negative red cells in evidence, the same applies.
Am I going completely down the wrong street?????????????