Jump to content

JYJ

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by JYJ

  1. Why don't you just test treated and untreated cells in parallel with a normal anti-M or anti-N?  The untreated cells will be positive and the trypsin treated cells will be negative.  Won't they??

    Thanks for your response!  I agree that this seems like a logical "check" of treatment and we tried this with Anti-M and the cells were still weakly positive.  I don’t believe that the antigens are always destroyed, but are “altered.”  We did not feel like this was a good test of treatment as it could be very subjective and not as clear cut as N negative becomes macroscopically positive.  While the literature I read does state that the M and N antigens are denatured, this was not a suggested method of checking the enzyme treatment.  The published method is to test treated N negative cells with N lectin.  Since the publication tell us to use N lectin, we were hoping to find another source of N lectin so that we would not have to complete a huge validation on another method that is not as reliable. 

  2. Trypsin is a valuable enzyme used in our IRL.  In order to determine if treatment is successful, we test trypsin treated reagent red cells with N lectin (Vicea Graminea).  Trypsin treated N negative red cells test positive with N lectin.  Unfortunately, we have been informed that our current suplier of N lectin is stopping production.  We are in search of a new source of N lectin and are wondering what other labs are using.  We have procedures for making the lectin ourselves, but we are unable to find a supplier of Vicea Graminea seeds.  Any information is appreciated. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.