Jump to content
April 2024 Challenge

goodchild

Members - Bounced Email
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    895

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

  • Country

    United States

 Content Type 

Status Updates posted by goodchild

  1. goodchild

    Dansket, Would you be willing to share a screenshot of what your Type and Screen result entry screen looks like? Specifically curious of how you have established the interface of results from ProVue.

    The person who set it up here added two extra fields, Provue BT and PVRH, which they insisted were necessary to be able to interface results.

    I'm just now getting around to fixing the Type and Screen (if you notice, we still have anti-A,B under patient testing but we haven't used it as such in more than ten years). I've never done any result mapping for an interface and I want to warm my mind up for when I work on the interface for the Erytra in a few months.

    TYSC.jpg

    Thanks in advance!

    1. Dansket

      Dansket

      Goodchild,

      Sorry to disappoint, but I don't have a ProVue interface to our Meditech C/S 5.67. 

      type and screen.png

    2. Dansket

      Dansket

      Goodchild,

      If I were to interface, my thinking is that I would only map the ProVue test reactions and not the ProVue Interpretations.  I would not want the interface to interfere with my calculations!  So I wouldn't need "PROVUE BT" and "PVRH".

       

  2. goodchild

    We have Meditech C/S 5.67. If you could help me figure out the best way of managing circumstances where pre-admission/procedure Type and Screen are ordered/collected on an outpatient (Lab outreach) account but the crossmatch/transfusion is to be on the surgical/oncology account, I would be extremely grateful. We use the product configuration that looks for BT/ABS results on the account within the last x number of hours. We don't want to transcribe results.

    1. amurphy

      amurphy

      We actually just finished an enhancement for this feature this past summer! It's available in CS 5.67 PP10, and was tracked on issue LIT-1707.  Do you perhaps have an upcoming update?  Prior to this priority pack, we have a knowledge base article, # 29416, that details the options available.  

    2. goodchild

      goodchild

      I have a copy of KBA #29416. I don't know if it's something conflicting in other dictionaries but the steps it describes has no bearing on the fact that BT/ABS results need to be on the surgical/oncology account to be able to crossmatch. While attempting the steps in the TEST system, we still get the expected error "Patient has no verified blood type within x hours."

      Thank you for the info and I'll ask our IS analyst about PP10/LIT-1707.

    3. amurphy

      amurphy

      A couple of years back, we introduced an enhancement to allow the current verified blood type and/or antibody screen to be on any account on the medical record. This was complete for C/S 5.67 PP8, via CS LAB Request # 12879. It sounds like this was either not implemented, or you have not yet updated to this release, but you may also want to look into that.  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.