Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
comment_56130

Is the use of C/T ratios appropriate for monitoring blood use management in surgical services dept.? I can understand it for inpatients and other departments (dialysis, etc.), but not so for OR...please weigh-in.

  • Replies 5
  • Views 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Peer review for like procedures is more relevant than C/T ratios. If Dr. X is using twice as much blood as surgeons in the same facility and facilities elsewhere for the same procedure, he/she is usin

  • David Saikin
    David Saikin

    We still evaluate the CT ratio on our surgeons.  Only rarely does this exceed 2.0.  As a group they average 1.3-1.5 though every once in a while there will be an outlier.  We did have an ortho guy who

  • See if there are any ways you can streamline your processes in the Blood Bank to not have so many set up for OR. We changed our SSBOS requirements; almost all procedures now get only a Type and Screen

comment_56146

Peer review for like procedures is more relevant than C/T ratios. If Dr. X is using twice as much blood as surgeons in the same facility and facilities elsewhere for the same procedure, he/she is using too much blood. Not that we are currently doing this, but our new pathologist is interested in the idea.

comment_56171

See if there are any ways you can streamline your processes in the Blood Bank to not have so many set up for OR. We changed our SSBOS requirements; almost all procedures now get only a Type and Screen. Since we do electronic crossmatches now, we only crossmatch units ahead for patients with antibodies.

comment_56173

About 10 years ago (after we had implemented the electronic crossmatch), we stopped crossmatching blood for the purpose of anticipated transfusion. Excepting for patients with antibody, we only crossmatch blood on receipt of a request to issue blood for transfusion (regardless of patient's location in the facility). Electronic crossmatch was part of the blood issue process. All blood components were delivered to patient's location via pneumatic tube or dumbwaiter to surgery.

Edited by Dansket

comment_56220

We still evaluate the CT ratio on our surgeons.  Only rarely does this exceed 2.0.  As a group they average 1.3-1.5 though every once in a while there will be an outlier.  We did have an ortho guy who transfused excessively (hgb<10).  We harangued him with artilces and peer review and he now is in compliance both in house and national usage stats.

  • 8 months later...
comment_59309

We calculate C/T for all our users three monthly and review for adherence to MSBOS.

 

Medical is always close to 1.0. Surgical in range 1.2 to 1.5. Sometimes this is pushed up to 1.5 mark by returns to theatre with abdo surgeries - they tend to order more as they don't know what they will find on opening. The consultants all know we review it. Any outliers for no good reason are chatted to by the consultant Haematologist.  

Cheers

Eoin :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.