Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
comment_55321

I have a referral patient - 74 yo male; R1R1; M:0, Fya: 0.  He has a history of anti-c, which is undetectable in gel both neat and with ficin pretreatment.  I have r/o every ab on the panel antigram with 2 different manufacturers' products (except Jsa and f).  Every rr cell is 1+ and 2+ with ficin pretreatment.  All the rr cells are M+, most homozygous, a few hetero but no reactivity is destroyed by enzyme (my ficin qc was right on).   The man is way up north in NH with a 5gm hgb.  I sent them 3u ABORh specific, c neg rbcs, ahgxm compatible.

 

Any notions on the rr reactivity.  I thought it was going to be anti-f but the guy is e+ - could it still be?  Any and all thoughts are welcome 'cuz I am stuck. 

 

Thanks in advance.

Edited by David Saikin

  • Replies 7
  • Views 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Malcolm Needs
    Malcolm Needs

    I have ABSOLUTELY no doubt that the antibody is anti-f. Just because the patient is e+ in no way precludes him from making anti-f, the "other name" for which is anti-ce. In other words, it is a COMPO

  • Malcolm to the rescue once again.!  

  • David Saikin
    David Saikin

    Thanks Malcolm - I was leaning there.  In fact I just called the hospital and told I was pretty certain it was anti-f.

comment_55322

I have ABSOLUTELY no doubt that the antibody is anti-f.

Just because the patient is e+ in no way precludes him from making anti-f, the "other name" for which is anti-ce. In other words, it is a COMPOUND antibody that will only react when the RHc and RHe genes are in the cis position (but not in the trans position, and not when only one of the antigens (in this case, the e antigen) is expressed on the red cells of the antibody producer.

  • Author
comment_55325

Thanks Malcolm - I was leaning there.  In fact I just called the hospital and told I was pretty certain it was anti-f.

comment_55331

Aren't those compound antigens fun?  We just referred a pregnant patient for antibody ID and titer with a history of anti-C, but we were getting additional reactions that we couldn't quite figure out.  Our reference lab had to refer it to a Level 1 reference lab because they couldn't figure it out either.  Turned out to actually be an anti-rhi AND an anti-e (overkill??).  Anti-C was excluded.  I looked back at our original panel on this patient and the reactivity did appeared to be an anti-C, even in hindsight.

  • Author
comment_55332

It was pretty obvious but - I've been in the field over 40 yrs and this is the first anti-f for me.  It just made me uncomfortable but when I wrote out CDe/CDe instead of R1R1 I thought for sure that it could be anti-f.  Just needed some reassurance.

comment_55341

Well, I think they are BankerGirl, but then, I've always been considered a bit weird by my friends and colleagues!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

comment_55367

Yes, what Malcolm said.  We identify anti-f once or twice per year.  The majority of these patients are D+C+c+E+e+ so presumably R1R2 and therefore f negative.

  • 3 weeks later...
comment_55623

Malcolm to the rescue once again.! :D  :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.