Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
comment_52777

Our lab is receiving cord in either EDTA tube or serum tube. Is washing required for ABO typing on a cord blood sample to minimize the affects of Wharton's jelly? I'm founding couple literatures on Wharton's jelly with DAT but none on ABORh.

Sorry to make a new posting about this topic, I didn't realize there was posting of "washing cord blood". But I am specifically looking for reference. If AABB manual,what page? I'm just not finding it.

Edited by youngwookim

  • Replies 6
  • Views 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • http://www.cbbsweb.org/enf/2012/cordbloodwash.php Since not all samples are contaminated with Wharton's jelly, I've heard of some places only washing if they get a cord blood that types as AB Pos to

  • All our cord blood orders have an order for a DAT with them, so it is just as easy to wash tubes for the ABORH at the same time. Works well and prevents problems even though it probably isn't reeally

comment_52783

http://www.cbbsweb.org/enf/2012/cordbloodwash.php

Since not all samples are contaminated with Wharton's jelly, I've heard of some places only washing if they get a cord blood that types as AB Pos to rule out contamination.

We don't wash because we perform ours on automation (Tango).

comment_52784

Well, the answer to that one depends on how good your staff are at obtaining 'clean' cord blood samples. I know that nowadays, most cord samples are 'clean'. In that case, for normal routine work, and depending on the technique you use, it should not be necessary to wash. But if your (obligatory, in my opinion!) reagent control is positive, or your results are at all 'odd', then I would definitely wash.

comment_52788

All our cord blood orders have an order for a DAT with them, so it is just as easy to wash tubes for the ABORH at the same time. Works well and prevents problems even though it probably isn't reeally necessary. :) 

comment_52793

We don't wash unless the Rh control tube is agglutinated regardless of test method.

  • 2 weeks later...
comment_53026

In 13 years I have only seen one case of Wharton's jelly contamination. That case was washed and the results were only delayed by about 30 minutes - the only reason for us doing a cord blood is to issue Anti-D, so it is hardly a pressing issue. Why make work for yourself? :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.