Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
comment_39132

Is an autocontrol or a DAT required when doing antibody identification? We do run an auto with each liquid panel but we also use the ECHO for antibody ID as well, the instrument doesn't do an auto. I realize that running the auto and a DAT can provide valuable information, however, if the id is staight forward is it realy necessary.

Thanks

Tony

  • Replies 2
  • Views 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

comment_39141

It is not required, but an auto is always a good idea. We always run one, and there have been several occasions when we have been surprised to get an unexpected positive auto.

On the other hand, if the specificity really is straightforward, and you can demonstrate that the patient does not express the corresponding antigen, then, in my opinion, go for it.

I certainly didn't run a DAT on all such samples when, back in the day, I was working in the hospital environment, and, depending upon the findings reported by the hospital laboratory upon submission, we don't always do so now that I work in a Reference Laboratory - waste of money!

  • Author
comment_39142

Thanks Malcolm, we used to do a DAT on everyone we did a screen on and we ended up doing a lot of elutions, which are time consuming and an additional charge to the patient.

Tony

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.