Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_37424

This is the form we use. One of our docs has requested that we change the wording so that he doesn't accept full responsibility. He told me he was willing to split the responsibility 50/50 or so, but doesn't think it is fair that he accept 100%!

RELEASE.DOC

  • Replies 35
  • Views 12.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • We have the Meditech computer system and can enter "L" as the interpretation of a XM. This means that it is "least incompatible" and can be issued to the patient in the computer. We discuss the situat

  • Malcolm Needs
    Malcolm Needs

    When we do the cross-match for the hospital, we issue the blood as "suitable", rather than "compatible", and issue a warning that, under such circumstances, the observations during the transfusion are

  • David Saikin
    David Saikin

    If we can autoabsorb out the auto and get compatible units we report them as compatible with absorbed plasma. The docs still sign for incompatible with the nature of the incompatiblitly being an auto

  • 1 year later...
comment_49347

Just curious... When a patient has a 'probable HTLA' is it necessary to provide phenotypically matched units? Even when clinically significant antibodies are ruled out?

comment_49348

It depends what you mean by phenotypically-matched units, and on the underlying pathology of the patient.

comment_49349
Just curious... When a patient has a 'probable HTLA' is it necessary to provide phenotypically matched units? Even when clinically significant antibodies are ruled out?

What do you meen with "probeble HTLA", is that only weak reactions and a high titer, or do yo have more info.

If most allo's are ruled out then we would only select for RhCcEe and K compatible.

Peter

comment_49363

I am curious what proportion of us have some way of documenting the doctor's notification of the need to or responsibility for giving incompatible blood in the presence of autoantibodies so I am going to try to post a poll in the poll section. Please vote--even all of you that usually just lurk and don't usually post. :)

comment_49400

Yes 'Probable htla' as in weak reactions with a high titer and everything has been ruled out. And phenotypically matched for Rh's, K, Fy's, Kidds, MNSs. I think it's a bit overkill but I'm curious to know what other institutions routinely do.

comment_49403

I think that is TOTAL overkill. We would transfuse Rh and K matched only (and, of course, ABO!!!!!!!!!!!!).

  • 3 years later...
comment_65425

I know this is an older topic, but here is a copy of our high risk/emergency release form.  When it is emergency release for the ED, we are not as picky about getting it back, usually give it a day.  When we know there is a problem with a warm autoantibody or non antigen typed units for an antibody patient we require the form be signed before issuing any units.       HIGH RISK TRANSFUSION & EMERGENCY RELEASE FORM.doc

comment_65426

I know this is an older topic, but here is a copy of our high risk/emergency release form.  When it is emergency release for the ED, we are not as picky about getting it back, usually give it a day.  When we know there is a problem with a warm autoantibody or non antigen typed units for an antibody patient we require the form be signed before issuing any units.       HIGH RISK TRANSFUSION & EMERGENCY RELEASE FORM.doc

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.