Jump to content

Featured Replies

comment_47458

I'm in agreement with the majority of replies. I would not feel comfortable calling this an autoantibody based on the two panels that were submitted. Without excluding anti-Fya and anti-C with certainty, I would suggest giving phenotypically matched blood until the suspect antibodies could be excluded- to be on the safe side. I also review antibody investigations and while I don't always agree with the interpretation, this study would require more work. An adsorption wouldn't be very high on my list of things to perform- mostly because of the negative cells using both LISS (gel) and PEG as enhancement. I would expect these agents to also enhance autoantibody reactivity which isn't proven to me given the presence of negative reactions.

We frequently see positive autocontrols using gel with a negative DAT.

Good luck being tactful - I sympathize since I suffer from a lack of filtering exactly what I'm thinking.

  • Replies 25
  • Views 16.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.