Reputation Activity
-
-
Removed got a reaction from Malcolm Needs in Rule out low incidence antibodies.Removed
-
Removed got a reaction from Malcolm Needs in Auto Anti-cIRemoved
-
Removed got a reaction from Malcolm Needs in More about Hyperhemolytic SyndromeRemoved
-
Removed got a reaction from Sandy L in More about Hyperhemolytic SyndromeRemoved
-
Removed got a reaction from Eoin in Anti-D in D+ IndividualsRemoved
-
Removed got a reaction from tbostock in More about Hyperhemolytic SyndromeRemoved
-
Removed got a reaction from Malcolm Needs in Interesting Case StudyRemoved
-
Removed reacted to Malcolm Needs in Anti-Jsa to screen or not to screenFrom what you say above RollSlow10, I would be inclined to adsorb out the anti-C, anti-E, anti-N, anti-K, anti-Fya, anti-Jkb and just leave the anti-Jsa. This should be easy, as you can use red cells from White donors, who are less likely (by far) to express the Jsa antigen.
As a control, you MUST use Js(a+b+) red cells, rather than the incredibly rare Js(a+b-) red cells, but, initially, I would test the adsorbed plasma with both (if available).
-
Removed got a reaction from AMcCord in Anti-D in D+ IndividualsRemoved
-
Removed got a reaction from Malcolm Needs in Anti-D in D+ IndividualsRemoved
-
Removed got a reaction from Malcolm Needs in Anti-Jsa to screen or not to screenRemoved
-
what about diffrential adsorption....elimnate anti -D remains your anti E and Anti -C ,if still its hard then adsorb any of these two ....hope it helps
