Jump to content

Interpreting "weak" results on MTS cards.


Recommended Posts

Good Morning Everyone! New member here :)

I have a silly question. I've been a tech for 9 years, and still debate this with myself all the time. When you are interpreting a screen or panel using MTS cards, at what point do you call a "weak" reaction a positive or negative? I've looked through the interpretation guide provided but I still struggle with this sometimes. Occasionally you will have a cell that appears mostly negative, but has a few small agglutinates, much less than what the images in the guide calls "weak" (Usually gives a ? if using the Provue). I wish I had a photo of what type of reaction I am talking about, but I'm sure those using ID-MTS know what I'm talking about :P

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SweetieShellie,

I guess I understand what you mean. Whenever I have such reaction in my gel cards, I look for other factors before I call it positive or negative. Firstly, I look for my negative controls, which will give me an idea of negative reaction. I also look for patient diagnosis, pregnancy hx, transfusion hx or any thing that has potential to cause positive reaction. I am very conservative about grading my reaction.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Similar practice here.  There are thinbgs that can cause gel interference that look like they may be junk, including a dried speck of 0.8% cells that hangs above and otherwise negative bunch of cells at the bottom of the tube.  

However, if it is an artifact, somehow it must be proven to be only that.  If it is due to the gel, then we do a tube screen to see if we can get a clean negative.  Likewise, for really weak gel screening reactions (Ortho says to report as 1+), we may do a panel to make sure there is no pattern that would match an emerging alloantibody (a young zebra--but still important!).

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎7‎/‎2017 at 9:02 AM, SweetieShellie said:

Good Morning Everyone! New member here :)

I have a silly question. I've been a tech for 9 years, and still debate this with myself all the time. When you are interpreting a screen or panel using MTS cards, at what point do you call a "weak" reaction a positive or negative? I've looked through the interpretation guide provided but I still struggle with this sometimes. Occasionally you will have a cell that appears mostly negative, but has a few small agglutinates, much less than what the images in the guide calls "weak" (Usually gives a ? if using the Provue). I wish I had a photo of what type of reaction I am talking about, but I'm sure those using ID-MTS know what I'm talking about :P

 

Thanks!

I think that after you use them for a long time.....running panels and seeing which "positive" reactions pan out to be something, and which do not; you start to get an "eye" for what is a true positive vs. a few red dots that are not going to give you anything (or, you learn the "look" of a cold agglutinin; rouleaux; warm auto; vs. clinically significant antibodies).  I think it just takes time and experience (going after the questionable reactions long enough to know "when" to go after them)  to feel comfortable (and in the end, you could still be wrong; but there is also a good chance that if it is so weak that you can't decide whether to call it Positive or not, you probably won't find anything anyway).  Just my opinion. :)

Brenda Hutson, MT(ASCP)SBB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.