Jump to content

D Molecular Testing


Recommended Posts

Ok, so I posted a very brrroooaaad post yesterday that was titled "Multiple Questions".....but had responses to none of the questions.  So, let me narrow it down a little (sorry about that  :P ).  What I most want to know about is what all of you are doing with your pregnant patients that type 2+ with Anti-D?  Are you sending them out for molecular testing?  Or do you have a lower cut-off for that?  Just curious because I currently have one.

Thanks,

Brenda Hutson, MT(ASCP)SBB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are not sending any patients out for molecular testing at this time. My medical directory wants to see more published on different populations before he bases recommendations for RhoGAM  adminstration, etc on molecular types. He's pretty cautious. Until then he doesn't see any point in asking for an expensive test that we are not going to base treatment decisions on. So, if our patients are not 2+ or greater with all 3 anti-D reagents we use (one traditional, two different reagents on the Echo), we call them Rh negative and transfuse accordingly. We would recommend RhoGAM for OB patients in this category as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, CarrieM said:

We send ours out for molecular if </= 2+ in gel and no increase in incubated tube.  The vast majority do come back as being eligible to receive Rh+ blood and not RhIg candidates.

We are trying to get this started here, though we usually test the ones that are negative on the ECHO and then have a positive Weak D and are usually positive (weak) in tubes.  Have sent out 2 patients so far, both came back OK for RH pos units and no RhIg.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We send out our pregnant patients for D molecular testing if they have a specimen sent out to a reference lab that ID's them as Rh Negative and then when they come here for their RhIG injection we test them as Rh Positive in Gel. So far everyone of them we have sent has come back as not being candidates for RhIG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were using BCW, but now we have a genomics lab about 2 hours from our hospital.  http://nybloodcenter.org/about-us/press-room/new-innovative-national-center-blood-group-genomics-created-nybc/

Both facilities provide transfusion/RhIg recommendations in the report.

We send women who are pregnant or have potential to be.

Edited by CarrieM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎7‎/‎2017 at 6:36 PM, CarrieM said:

 

Sorry - did not mean to pick up a quote -

We send our molecular testing to United Blood Services reference lab in Tempe AZ and they send it on to a Grifols Lab in San Marcos TX - 855-600-7101.  UBS said they had the best pricing and turnaround time.  The Grifols report states RH genotype and UBS interprets it as to RhIg or not / Rh pos blood or not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems like a great deal of expense for what end?  To determine if a patient is a RhIg candidate? OR WHAT.

I was a member of  a TAC for one of the BB vendors last summer.  We discussed Rh molecular testing.  The company thought it was  valuable, the committee members thought it was not worth the bang for the buck.  Unless the price has come down significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎11‎/‎2017 at 6:22 PM, David Saikin said:

seems like a great deal of expense for what end?  To determine if a patient is a RhIg candidate? OR WHAT.

I was a member of  a TAC for one of the BB vendors last summer.  We discussed Rh molecular testing.  The company thought it was  valuable, the committee members thought it was not worth the bang for the buck.  Unless the price has come down significantly.

So what is YOUR cut-off grade for considering the woman a rhogam candidate?  Completely Rh NEG; or are their some weak reactions that you consider and just take the conservative approach and give rhogam?

Inquiring Minds Want to Know!:unsure:

Thanks

Brenda Hutson

P.S.  How are you liking it out in Santa Barbara?  I am VERY jealous and really miss California. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 3/17/2017 at 9:49 AM, Brenda Hutson said:

So what is YOUR cut-off grade for considering the woman a rhogam candidate?  Completely Rh NEG; or are their some weak reactions that you consider and just take the conservative approach and give rhogam?

Inquiring Minds Want to Know!:unsure:

Thanks

Brenda Hutson

P.S.  How are you liking it out in Santa Barbara?  I am VERY jealous and really miss California. 

I like a cutoff of 1+ though I have seen/documented dome 2+ gel rxs that were classic weak D (if I was doing tube Ds I'd fgive the RhIg.  I think this is the Medical Director's call.  Whatever is comfortable for them would work for me.

I Loved Santa Barbara but am back in NH now.  Actually I retired from the lab field after a very brief medical problem.  My body said i t was time to stop so I listened.  Now I'm just playing music, substitute teaching down the street from my house, and doing an occasional BB consult.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we get a 2+ on a pregnant patient or woman in child bearing years we confirm the 2+ in tube. If the patient is still a 2+ we interpret the patient as Rh Negative and send the patient out for molecular testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may need to keep your patient population in mind.  Our hospitals are in cities with very global populations and we do see women who appear D Pos, but have developed an Anti-D.   So we see value in having this testing performed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're doing pretty much the same as the majority - <1+ is presumptive Rh Neg and gets RHIG for pregnant patients. 

Very rarely will we send out a sample for molecular (BCW) but we have a very diverse mix of immigrants, so we do that occasionally on a case by case basis.

My medical director and I agree that the cost of molecular does not justify testing on a routine basis.  As David says, not worth the bang for the buck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.