Jump to content

It must be THAT time of year again!


Recommended Posts

I don't know what is going on at the moment, but, in the last two weeks we have had an anti-Ch, an anti-Rg, an anti-Ge2 in a patient with alcoholic liver disease, a pregnant Oh, an anti-Jk3 for surgery, an anti-Yta in pregnancy and an anti-K+Jkb+Csa in a bleeding patient.

Keeps life interesting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malcolm, what a co-incidence we had a pregnant Oh patient for delivery just 3 days ago. They asked for 2 units of PRC to be kept ready. The best thing or worst thing (as you look at it) was that this was her second delivery and they didn't know her blood group. The first delivery was done elsewhere.She already had a 4 year daughter. We spoke to the consultant as well as her husband (he was A+) and stressed about importance of knowing the blood group of their first daughter as well as the propositus's siblings (3 sisters & 1 brother) & parents. He said he will inform them as they were elsewhere, but would bring their daughter for blood grouping next day, which he did not. They just didn't bother. The baby she delivered was A-ve and she was also H Ag negative. Really that time of the year :);)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aafrin, thanks for that.

 

One thing I would question though is, if the baby is group A, how could she also by H negative?  If the baby was genuinely H negative, the A antigen could not be expressed.  Could it be that the baby's H antigen was actually positive, but that the alpha-N-acetyl-D-galacosamine was sterically masking the H antigen, and that the H antigen could, in any case, be weakened, as the baby's L-fucosyl transferase would not be working to its full capacity until a bit later in life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Malcolm, thanks for answering the query I had in mind.

 

Since the baby was grouped from cord blood I was  wondering whether there could be contamination with mother's blood which was giving this result or something else masking the anti-H reaction.We had asked the father as well as consultant to get the baby's blood checked at two years age (preschool), but wonder whether he will?

 

I know the consultant wouldn't be bothered much since both the mother & child have been well & discharged from the hospital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IO suspect it's just that the A antigen has 'used up' all the available H; this is quite common in group A1 and AB, depending on the anti-H you use to detect it. Also she would anyway have to be heterozygous for H (Hh)so would probably make less H antigen anyway (not sure about that, though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Malcolm, thanks for answering the query I had in mind.

 

Since the baby was grouped from cord blood I was  wondering whether there could be contamination with mother's blood which was giving this result or something else masking the anti-H reaction.We had asked the father as well as consultant to get the baby's blood checked at two years age (preschool), but wonder whether he will?

 

I know the consultant wouldn't be bothered much since both the mother & child have been well & discharged from the hospital.

If the child is a secretor you could always look for H in the saliva. what two year old wouldn't like the opportunity to spit in a cup?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With great pleasure Donna.

My staff were all running around with smiles on their faces that reached from ear to ear!

To quote Phil above:

But isn't this why we do it? My students all know the correct response to "What's the most fun a blood banker can have?" In unison: "Antibody identification!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Last night was interesting again!  Having already done a six and a half hour stretch, I got called in again at about 23.15 for a sample from an elderly lady with an Hb of 60g/L.

 

She had an auto-anti-c using enzyme-treated red cells (although her DAT was negative), a known anti-Lua, a known anti-Fya (neither of which were detected in this current sample, and an anti-Yka by IAT.  Took a bit of sorting!

 

Today was cancelled!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.