Jump to content

Transfusion Reaction Workup


keathwade

Recommended Posts

Our transfusion reaction workup standard has been to do a clerical check, dat, and visualization of serum or plasma for hemolysis. If these are negative, then the workup is signed out as "no evidence of hemolytic transfusion reaction" and no further workup is done unless some unusual circumstance or finding is present to suggest something else be done. It is fortunate, I think that it is rare that any of the first-tier studies are positive and the workup is virtually all the time limited to the first tier studies.

One observer at our laboratory has voiced an opinion that in virtually every transfusion reaction workup, this limited workup is not adequate, and that every workup should include pre and post total and direct bilirubin, LDH, and haptoglobin as a minimum. This observer feels that the current standard of care requires these tests be added to the first-tier battery of tests.

Could members of this forum comment on what your standard first-tier testing consists of, and how often you find that you add more tests when the first-tier tests are negative?

Thanks for your input.

and

Happy New Year to all on the Blood Bank Talk forum!

Keath Wade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One has to ask the question, "How much is enough?". I can think of several other tests that may have some value, but when you look at the predictive value, it's quite low. And if you transfuse a couple old units, the suggested four tests may be slightly suggestive of hemolysis, so determining a cutoff would be interesting.

The clerical check has got to #1, the post DAT #2, and a visual check as #3 to catch those situations where #2 will be falsely negative due to destruction. These rule-out immediate hemolysis, and you can decide after that on clinical findings if additional work is warranted for situations of decreased survival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"One observer at our laboratory has voiced an opinion......"

I'm curious, who was this "observer" and what did they base their opinion on?

For everything but hives, we do a clerical check, a hemolysis check and on the post transfusion sample a DAT and ABO/Rh. If any of these are of concern the work-up gets real interesting. Otherwise we're done.

Oh yeah, for certain things we will also do bacterial studies but that is another story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beginning with the 22nd edition of the AABB Standards (effective 11/1/03) for a possible hemolytic reaction, a repeat ABO group determindation shall be performed on the posttransfusion sample, i.e., as part of the "first-tier" of testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did neglect to mention the repeat type and screen, which is part of our first-tier testing.

I was curious to see if any tranfusion services were going beyond the required testing as a routine. We have an opinion on the table that we are below the standard of care by doing only the Standards required testing in most cases, and so I wanted to ask how others feel about this. Also how often you find that clinical circumstances warrant additional testing, even when the standard initial testing is all negative?

Thanks for the responses. It is very nice to find this blood bank discussion group.

Keath Wade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're meeting the Standard's standards, then there shouldn't be an issue.

We do a clerical check, hemolysis check, and pre-/post- ABO/Rh and DAT. The doctor always has the option of ordering a haptoglobin, urine dipstick for bilirubin, blood cultures, etc. but they're usually satisfied as long as the inital workup shows no discrepancies.

I wonder if this 'observer' is a chemistry tech trying to boost testing volumes:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our transfusion reaction workup standard has been to do a cleical check, dat, and visualization of serum or plasma for hemolysis. If these are negative, then the workup is signed out as "no evidence of hemolytic transfusion reaction" and no further workup is done unless some unusual circumstance or finding is present to suggest something else be done. It is fortunate, I think that it is rare that any of the first-tier studies are positive and the workup is virtually all the time limited to the first tier studies.

One observer at our laboratory has voiced an opinion that in virtually every transfusion reaction workup, this limited workup is not adequate, and that every workup should include pre and post total and direct bilirubin, LDH, and haptoglobin as a minimum. This observer feels that the current standard of care requires these tests be added to the first-tier battery of tests.

Could members of this forum comment on what your standard first-tier testing consists of, and how often you find that you add more tests when the first-tier tests are negative?

Thanks for your input.

and

Happy New Year to all on the Blood Bank Talk forum!

Keath Wade

IN OUR LAB WE DO EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE DOING. WE ONLY CHECKED FOR CLERICAL ERRORS,DAT AND INSPECTED THE SERUM FOR HEMOLYSIS, THAT IS WHAT THE AABB ASK YOU TO DO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are doing as most have already indicated - just what is required by regs and then only doing additional testing if indicated. I would like to ask if everyone is performing these clerical checks and initial testing for reactions only to Red Blood Cells or for all blood products? I am also wondering if anyone has added anything for TRALI. What initial indicators are used to cause suspicion of TRALI? I have read MANY articles and it all sounds great - but in practice what are people looking at initially to cause you to look further? :confused:

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the responses. This is very helpful. I think that I have found that our current procedure and routine is within the "mainstream" of current laboratory practice. It is a good thing when questions like this arise. It allows an opportunity for a review of a particular aspect of our practice, where we can reassure ourselves that our current procedures are optimal and/or find some aspects of what we are doing could actually be improved. I was glad to find the bloodbanktalk forum!

Thanks again.

Keath Wade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CAP requires ABORH & Antibody screen on POST specimen....Some STATE(eg. NJ) requirement is same as CAP.

I have never seen any requirement for post antibody screen from CAP, unless post DAT is positive or hemolysis is present.

We just had our CAP/AABB inspection in October.

We do clerical check, pre and post ABO+Rh, DAT, hemolysis and icterus check. ABO+Rh and DAT on unit too. We only go further if any of these are positive.

I have a question though. Does anyone check the ABO on FFP or PLT's by doing a reverse with A1 and B cells?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to clerical checks, we do

Pre: Visual check, ABO/Rh, hgb, DAT or auto control

Post: Visual check, ABO/Rh, hgb, DAT, urine hgb (& urine RBC if positive)

BTW, I realize this is not the issue here, but are the non-1st tier tests billed out separately? I can't imagine a haptoglobin cost being recovered. I don't know that we're even getting our hgb & urine testing paid for...

Hope your mind's at ease about the extra chemistry testing--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We perform a clerical check on sample, unit, and transfusion slips. We perform visual inspections for hemolysis, ABO/Rh and DAT on pre and post samples. We also test a post urine for hemoglobin.

Negative results are forwarded on to our Medical Director for interpretation. If there are any positive results (excluding pos urine hemoglobin) that indicate a hemolytic reaction, we immediately notify our Medical Director and continue with additional testing.

I have only been working at my present job for ~5 years, but I have been told we have never had a reaction progress to phase 2 testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never seen any requirement for post antibody screen from CAP, unless post DAT is positive or hemolysis is present.

We just had our CAP/AABB inspection in October.

We do clerical check, pre and post ABO+Rh, DAT, hemolysis and icterus check. ABO+Rh and DAT on unit too. We only go further if any of these are positive.

I have a question though. Does anyone check the ABO on FFP or PLT's by doing a reverse with A1 and B cells?

We do not retype(reverse type) on our FFP & Platelet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi everyone,

This question does not quite follow the thread but is related to transfusion reaction workups. What transfusion related symptoms do you list in your procedure to initiate a blood culture being obtained from the unit? Does everyone still include a gram stain as part of their procedure? I have been told by my microbiologist that the automated blood culture process is more sensitive and a gram stain is not necessary upon collection. My FDA inspector was not so sure....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the suggestion of an inspector we also added a gram stain and culture of the unit involved to our first tier of testing. If the post DAT is positive, we perform a pre DAT beforme deciding to perform second tier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.