Jump to content

Blood Bank Automation


Guest Donna

Recommended Posts

We are using the Echo. We also have a manual workstation that uses that Capture strips used on the Echos. We have not yet set up this manual station, but plan to in the next few weeks. We are also keeping all of our tube testing reagents for those situations where the capture technology does not suffice. We have eliminated all our gel reagents and cards due to the cost and additional equipment required.

We do almost all of our antibody identifications on the Echos as well, and our techs are loving how much of the workups are now hands-off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are using the Echo and our manual backup is Tube/PEG. Most of our panels are being run on the Echo.

How do you keep people competent on the tube method when they do not do it very often. We are doing tube/PEG at our facility as our main method and I have noticed huge variations in reactions grading between days(dedicated blood bankers) and evenings/nights(gerneralists). If you have gerneralist do they do antibody workups? My facility has historically not required the evenings/nights to do antibody workups when they may be complex. The problem is now I have people having a hard time doing any workup, even simple ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because we still do some tube testing, we still subscribe to the manual J-series CAP, which is rotated among all techs. We also purchase Tech-Cheks from Immucor which contain simple antibody workups, ABO discrepancies, etc. These are also rotated among all techs, so that each tech receives a minumum of 2 Tech-Cheks and 1 or 2 CAP samples yearly. This provides each tech with an opportunity to prove competency on a regular basis. Of course another, more inexpensive, option would be to provide your generalist techs with samples you make up in-house for competency purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ditto on what KRichards just said. Also, only about 80 - 85% of our antibody screens are currently automated for one reason on another so the staff still gets plenty of practice with tubes and peg.

We are staffed 24/7 by blood bankers but there is still a variability from tech to tech on how they read their tubes. That is one of the biggest advantages to automation, every test is read the same. Until a year ago we had generalists who covered the entire lab to include transfusion services on the night shift. They were expected to do at least an attempted antibody ID when they found a positive antibody screen and they did very well for the most part. They are MTs and CLS, they know how to do it, they just need the practice to stay confident. Also, any tech working for me has full authority to refer any testing to the local IRL for help. Just for point of reference the local IRL is about 50 miles away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am interested in automation for a transfusion and blood bank service.

We currently are tube typing.

Does anyone use the Ortho Provue?

Hi, I use the provue at my 2nd job. I think it works well for places that don't have a dedicated staff and also it does work well in large transfusion services but the key is to have a process in place so that the work can flow smoothly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.