Jump to content

Weak D


pbaker

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Malcolm Needs said:

Well, you cannot call the baby Weak D+, as there is no such antibody as Anti-Weak-D, but to answer your intended question, it depends on whether or not the baby's red cells are DAT Positive or not, and also on what epitopes your anti-D are designed to detect.  It could be that the baby is a Partial D.

But the final interpretation of Rh would be positive or negative?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, pbaker said:

But the final interpretation of Rh would be positive or negative?????

Until there is a definitive answer, it MUST be D Negative, even though the chances are that, at that stage of life, the baby's immune system would not produce an anti-D if D Positive blood was transfused, BUT it could well be that the baby's immune system could be sensitised to the D antigen.  ALWAYS ERR ON THE SAFE SIDE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn states 'Anomalous or indeterminate cord Rh D groups should be treated as D positive until confirmatory testing is completed.'

For neonate transfusions see Malcolm's answer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to know what to do.  Most weak D patients will not make antibodies to D epitopes.  Most antibodies to D epitopes will not cause serious hemolysis.  But we don't have enough clinical data to predict which patients will make antibodies and which antibodies will be dangerous after transfusion or cause hemolytic disease of the newborn.  Hence we usually treat these patients as Rh positive for purposes of administering Rh immune globulin to the mother, and as Rh negative for transfusion purposes.  Not a major public health problem, but challenging.

Interestingly, automated gel technologies, and manual versions of these, often type patients as strongly Rh (D) positive when tube testing shows weaker reactions (2+ or less has semi-arbitrarily been chosen).  So we will soon be finding whether these patients can make anti-D antibodies and whether these antibodies are clinically significant.  My best guess is mostly not an issue.  It does solve the Rh immune globulin question, since the baby is Rh positive and one administers RhIgG to Rh negative mothers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Malcolm Needs said:

Until there is a definitive answer, it MUST be D Negative, even though the chances are that, at that stage of life, the baby's immune system would not produce an anti-D if D Positive blood was transfused, BUT it could well be that the baby's immune system could be sensitised to the D antigen.  ALWAYS ERR ON THE SAFE SIDE.

I agree with this if we are transfusing.  We would use O= anyway.  I'm talking about just the basic blood type of the baby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pbaker said:

I agree with this if we are transfusing.  We would use O= anyway.  I'm talking about just the basic blood type of the baby.

The ONLY way this can be determined accurately is by molecular, rather than serological techniques.  The reason I say this is because, although we tend to think in terms of foetal to maternal bleeds (foetal blood into mum's circulation), there is always the chance that the bleed can be maternal to foetus, thus meaning that serological testing can be unreliable at this stage of life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We would label the child rh+. The only problem this might cause is if the child returns to our hospital as an adult (we do not treat pediatrics in my facility) and required blood. The initial blood type might seem like a discrepancy since, conceivably, they would initially type rh negative but their historical record would say positive. Of course, we would simply verify this by looking at the previous testing results stored in our LIS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have frequently seen Rh discrepancies like this with hospital hoppers.  If we have (or can get) last hospital history one phone call resolves issue (plus weak D test). However We have had problems when the patient is adamant they are Rh pos (or neg) and we report the other. This has caused long delays for patients to get or accept the explanations and give consent (or re-consent) to be transfused. The added tech time for these situations can be frustrating on occasion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/7/2022 at 3:06 PM, pbaker said:

Can your computer system do that?  Ours cannot.

Yes, we built the weak D test as a separate test. The results of that test are not directly linked to the patient blood type. On cord bloods we report that result more as an interpretive comment to help OB nursing staff understand why mom is a candidate for RhIG AND we also tell them with another 'test' that RhIG is recommended if baby's weak D test is positive. Just to make sure we are all on the same page.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Advertisement

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.