Jump to content

amurphy

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Country

    United States

amurphy last won the day on December 8 2023

amurphy had the most liked content!

About amurphy

  • Birthday 08/16/1981

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    MA, US
  • Occupation
    EHR software designer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

amurphy's Achievements

Single Status Update

See all updates by amurphy

  1. We have Meditech C/S 5.67. If you could help me figure out the best way of managing circumstances where pre-admission/procedure Type and Screen are ordered/collected on an outpatient (Lab outreach) account but the crossmatch/transfusion is to be on the surgical/oncology account, I would be extremely grateful. We use the product configuration that looks for BT/ABS results on the account within the last x number of hours. We don't want to transcribe results.

    1. amurphy

      amurphy

      We actually just finished an enhancement for this feature this past summer! It's available in CS 5.67 PP10, and was tracked on issue LIT-1707.  Do you perhaps have an upcoming update?  Prior to this priority pack, we have a knowledge base article, # 29416, that details the options available.  

    2. goodchild

      goodchild

      I have a copy of KBA #29416. I don't know if it's something conflicting in other dictionaries but the steps it describes has no bearing on the fact that BT/ABS results need to be on the surgical/oncology account to be able to crossmatch. While attempting the steps in the TEST system, we still get the expected error "Patient has no verified blood type within x hours."

      Thank you for the info and I'll ask our IS analyst about PP10/LIT-1707.

    3. amurphy

      amurphy

      A couple of years back, we introduced an enhancement to allow the current verified blood type and/or antibody screen to be on any account on the medical record. This was complete for C/S 5.67 PP8, via CS LAB Request # 12879. It sounds like this was either not implemented, or you have not yet updated to this release, but you may also want to look into that.  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.