Jump to content

Malcolm Needs

Supporting Members
  • Posts

    8,483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    995
  • Country

    United Kingdom

Everything posted by Malcolm Needs

  1. Gosh, I remember those! Awful things!
  2. Loads, and I could only get to page 3. The site wouldn't let me go any further.
  3. This is another poll in which 16 people voted, but nobody replied. I don't think there were any comments to make.
  4. I don't think this one required any replies Cliff. It was just that I wanted somewhere to hang the algorrithm, and I had forgotten on to which thread it should go!
  5. 29 people voted on this one Cliff, it's just that none of us made any comments. As my good friend Rashmi started this thread, I am quite happy to make some comments, but they may not get through the firewall!
  6. Hi Anna, Thanks for that. Now, I know you're not going to believe this, but I actually understood your explanation! Wonders will never cease! :excited::eyepoppin:excited:
  7. It could well be that the adhesive on the back of the labels has not been proven to be safe. By this, I mean that some adhesives have been shown to migrate through the plastic of the bag and leech into the blood. We had this problem in the UK. We had to get labels with an adhesive that was proven not to go through the plastic, or did not affect the blood if it did (I think the former).
  8. Oh yes Rashmi. I agree that writing the Technical Agreement is easy enough. Getting them to take any notice whatsoever is another thing entirely. As you know, we have Service Level Agreements with all of our hospitals, and this covers the hospitals responsibilities to us, as well as ours to them. One bit of this involves providing samples that are fit for purpose (fully labelleed, adequate in volume, etc), and yet we have to reject a goodly proportion of samples sent to us because they are either poorly labelled or are just plain inadequate in volume (and this is after me regularly having a rant at TAG meetings).
  9. Yes, I thought that availability could be a problem.
  10. , but then a procedure stating transfusion staff involvement might just be easier to do?
  11. Have you tried getting supplies from the Bio Products Laboratory in the UK. I believe I am correct in saying that they have been awarded an FDA licence. That having been said, I do not know about availability or price, but if you are short it could be worth a try.
  12. Yes, I meant anti-C3c in my earlier post; not anti-C3b. 54 and I still don't know what I'm talking about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  13. Well, we are the blood supplier, but yes, we do test most (if not all) units for high titre ABO antibodies and put the information on the blood bag labels.
  14. No! I wouldn't be seen dead in an aluminium suit, and as for those sun glasses!
  15. That's an excellent point about giving group O blood in case of maternal IgG anti-A and/or anti-B, but at the same time you should also make sure that the unit is negative for high titre anti-A and/or anti-B.
  16. Sorry, I've had a look on the internet in the UK, and I can't find any either.
  17. I missed that bit John. I agree with your obvious worries about this.
  18. I don't I'm afraid. I know that one used to have to order them directly from Montgomery Scientific Publications.
  19. Hi David, The card containing all of these reagents is produced by DiaMed, but I seem to remember that Anna (galvania) saying that it is only on sale in Europe. It is what we routinely use, but it must be remembered that we are a Reference Laboratory (something I forget myself sometimes when I'm posting on here, and answering a question from a Hospital Blood Banker) and so many of the samples referred have already been tested by either broad spectrum reagents or by monospecific anti-IgG and anti-C3d. Just occasionally, we receive a sample from a patient who is clinically showing a picture of WAIHA, but with a negative DAT at the hospital, that gives a positive DAT in our hands with anti-IgA only. I attach a not very good photograph so that you can see what the card looks like. :) IgA DAT.zip
  20. Hi Tristram, Please could you tell me what you were able to rule out with your first panel, and what you were trying to rule out with your second? This is quite important information to know before making any suggestions. Thanks.
  21. Well, a lot of people have accused me of having a split personality!
  22. We use monospecific anti-IgG, anti-IgA, anti-IgM, anti-C3b and anti-C3d in a gel card, with a control column.
  23. We get irritated when they ask for blood!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D:D
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.