Jump to content

RichU

Members
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4
  • Country

    Isle Of Man

Posts posted by RichU

  1. On 5/12/2023 at 9:16 PM, SBBSue said:

    Not all of our moms get a type and screen when admitted.  I agree that the screen is redundant, but I am wondering if we did it for the sake of consistency, when a large portion of our staff was generalists.  At least we no longer repeat the antibody ID when they have D from RhIg. 

    How do you know a positive screen isn't caused by an alloantibody underlying the prophylactic anti-D unless you do an ABID?

  2. NHSBT routinely perform IAT and enzyme IAT using BioRad LISS/Coombs cards. (Anti-IgG + C3d). I found this helps identification with some weak antibodies or where there is a mixture and one is enzyme sensitive.

    At my current hospital we still perform enzyme panels on NaCl cards. There are less reactions with antibodies we don't wish to detect.

    Of course you can't use enzyme techniques alone when identifying antibodies so it's a choice between; improved identification and detecting more insignificant antibodies (enz IAT) or Detection of fewer bothersome  antibodies but harder to ID some cases (enzyme).

    Maybe use IAT and enzyme routinely and employ enzyme IAT to help solve tricky/weak examples?

    You would have to do some kind of testing/documentation/risk assessment etc. if you're not following manufacturer's package insert I assume.

     

     

  3. BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn states 'Anomalous or indeterminate cord Rh D groups should be treated as D positive until confirmatory testing is completed.'

    For neonate transfusions see Malcolm's answer.

     

  4. I guess low titre anti-A and anti-B.

    We don't have any whole blood. The usual major haemorrhage pack provided is 4 red cells and 4 FFP for transfusion in 1:1 ratio.

    During the TT motorcycle road racing we keep a box of 2 O neg red cells and 2 group A FFP for immediate use. This hopefully gives us time to test a sample and issue group specific if further units are required.

  5. When I worked for NHSBT RCI we kept the cells used for XM in Cellstab (containing preservative) for about a week.

    All our serology was performed manually so we had already taken an aliquot of cells which had been washed in saline before making suspensions. (Usually in Dil2 or BioVue's equivalent)

  6. We use DiaMed tech. Manual work is read using the Banjo card reader. Reagents are all scanned into the IH.com software to give a full audit trail - user, batch numbers, expiry.

    Unless the QC has been performed (identical to the analyser) and read the results have a QC watermark across them.

  7. Just an observation....

    When I worked in a reference lab in the UK we tested the patient's cells against AB serum in parallel when performing IAT typing. This was part of the testing protocol and there was no DAT required.

    I would only think about doing a DAT if this negative control was positive.

    Is there a charge for running a monoclonal control with monoclonal typing reagents?

  8. No products/components since 2016 (see  my previous post) TO OUR KNOWLEDGE.

    Being a small island nation, patients quite often get treatment in the UK which we don't know about and vice versa - very helpful. So he may have had D pos platelets. I think it unlikely he had D pos red cells for a planned procedure.

    We did XM 4 units (O neg) in 2016 but none were required.

    Thanks all

  9. Hi Guys,

    Has anyone seen the following scenario before and , if so, how common is it? 

    2002 male O neg patient transfused 4 units of Oneg and 6 O pos.

    2012 and 2014 antibody screen negative. Now using the same methodology (DiaMed IAT), we have a strong anti-D. No D positive units transfused since 2002.

    Why is anti-D now apparent 20 years after the transfusion of D pos cells but not 10 years ago?

    Cheers,

    RichU

  10. I think it depends on individual circumstances. I would not keep K- units as a requirement for these patients once therapy has ended and no antibodies are detected.

    I would always give c-, E- units to an R1R1 patient with anti-c whether or not anti-E had been detected.

    @Malcolm - as I've said before, there are always caveats with serology! (even that statement)

  11. Hi all,

    Can I have your opinions/policies regarding the following please?

    We currently have 15 members of the on call rota, 12 of these are not transfusion staff. Therefore we only get 2 sessions a month and sometimes wont be performing any serology for weeks.

    Everyone does have to do 10 days in here per annum.

    More people want to join the rota and the pathology manager thinks this is a great idea.

    I am concerned that, especially the ones new to transfusion, won't be particularly competent with that level of experience.

    Thanks,

    Rich

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.