Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. galvania

    galvania

    Members


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      885


  2. pstruik

    pstruik

    Members - Bounced Email


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      46


  3. SMILLER

    SMILLER

    Members - Bounced Email


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      1,373


  4. exlimey

    exlimey

    Members


    • Points

      1

    • Posts

      381


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/28/2018 in all areas

  1. I would say that an electron microscope or a telescope would qualify as an optical aid also, but I am pretty sure that is not the intent of Immucor using that term either. The problem with using, say, a high-dry (40x) microscope objective on a specimen from a tube on a slide is that you will have to define how you are going to deal with a false positive. Because as it has been pointed out above, most specimens examined by tilt-tube, be they ABO typings or something involving AHG, will be seen to have at least a few small agglutinated clumps of RBCs if you look at it this closely. To create a procedure for using a scope, one would have to arbitrarily define what can and cannot be ignored under these conditions. Scott
    1 point
  2. Along the same lines......the basis of my personal safety approach: "If it's wet, and NOT yours, don't touch it."
    1 point
  3. And never EVER , under ANY circumstances look at gel tests under a microscope or a magnifying glass - unless you want to call absolutely everything positive and waste everybody's time
    1 point
  4. 'Use common sense, and don't lick anything in the lab' - now that's my kind of policy!
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.